module 6_dra 1

Upload: icule-monteron

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    1/92

    Basics ofDisaster Risk Assessment

    Training of Trainers on DRR/CCA for Local Partners

    8 11 December 2012

    Tagaytay City

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    2/92

    Scope/CoveragePart I: Disasters, Climate Change and

    Development

    Module 1. Interrelationship of Disasters,Climate Change and Development

    Part II: Disaster Risk Management

    Module 2. Hazard 101: Geologic HazardsModule 3. Hazard 102: Hydro-meteorologic

    Hazards

    Module 4. NDRRMC Policies/Plans. Framework

    and Action Plan/s

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    3/92

    Part III: Climate Change and AdaptationModule 5. Basics of Climate Change andClimate Change Projections

    Module 6. Policies/Plans. Strategies/frameworkand NCCAP

    Part IV: Climate/Disaster RiskAssessment and MainstreamingTools

    Module 7. Basics of Disaster Risk Assessment

    Module 8. Climate Change Sectoral Vulnerabilityand Adaptation Assessment

    Module 9. DRR/CCA Mainstreaming intoDevelopment Planning

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    4/92

    1. Introduction

    2. Theoretical framework3. DRA: from theory to practice

    4. DRR/DRM

    Outline:

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    5/92

    Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    6/92

    Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    7/92Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    8/92Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    9/92Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    10/92

    Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    11/92Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    12/92Source: Mnchener Rckversicherungs-Gesellschaft, Geo Risks Research, NatCatSERVICE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    13/92

    Estimated Damage of Disasters(In M PhP @ 2000 Prices)

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    80,000

    19 70 19 71 19 72 19 73 19 74 19 75 19 76 19 77 19 78 19 79 19 80 19 81 19 82 19 83

    19 8 4 19 8 5 19 8 6 19 8 7 19 8 8 19 89 19 9 0 19 9 1 19 9 2 19 9 3 19 9 4 19 9 5 19 9 6 19 9 7

    19 9 8 19 9 9 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 2 0 0 6

    On the average, annual direct damage is P15 B

    Pinatubo Eruption(1991)

    15 disasters(1978)

    Droughts(1984; 1987)

    1.2% of GDP

    0.9% of GDP

    Luzon Earthquake(1990)

    For typhoons, average of 0.5% of GDP every year

    Source: NEDA

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    14/92

    No. of deaths, injuries and affected

    persons, 1980-2006

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    Deaths 5,220 17,249 8,555

    Injured 19,315 15,166 6,201

    Af fected ('000

    persons)

    13,713 68,911 42,543

    1980-1990 1990-2000 2000-2006

    Source: NEDA

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    15/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    16/92

    TheoreticalFramework

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    17/92

    Hazard is the potential to cause harm.

    A threatening event, or the probability of occurrenceof a potentially damaging phenomenon, within a giventime period and area that may cause loss of life orinjury, property damage, social and economicdisruption or environmental degradation or a

    combination of these. (NEDA Guideline)A dangerous phenomenon, substance, human activityor condition that may cause loss of life, injury or otherhealth impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoodand services, social and economic disruption, orenvironmental damage. (PDRRM Act)

    Hazard

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    18/92

    RiskRisk is the likelihood of an adverseeffect, direct or indirect, on human

    health and welfare.As a technical term,risk shall be expressed as acombination of frequency (or probability), and theconsequence of a specific hazardous event. It should be

    noted that in some literatures, the expression of riskincludes the severity of damage or adverse result thatcould be in terms of fatality, or injury, or cost of propertyloss per unit of time.

    Risk is the combination of the probability of an eventand its negative consequences. (PDRRM Act)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    19/92

    Vulnerability degree to which a system is susceptible to,or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change,including climate variability and extremes. Vulnerability isa function of the character, magnitude and rate of climatechange and variation to which a system is exposed, itssensitivity, and its adaptive capacity. (CC Act)

    Vulnerability characteristics and circumstances of acommunity, system or asset that make it susceptible to the

    damaging effects of a hazard. Vulnerability may arise fromvarious physical, economic and environmental factors suchas poor design and construction of buildings, inadequateprotection of assets, lack of public information andawareness, limited official recognition of risks and

    preparedness measures, and disregard for wiseenvironmental management. (PDRRM Act)

    Vulnerability

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    20/92

    VulnerabilityVulnerability generally refers toconditions which define how elements

    exposed to risk are affected by a hazard. Sectoral vulnerability

    Physical vulnerability

    Economic vulnerability

    Social vulnerability

    Environmental vulnerability

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    21/92

    Natural disaster when a natural hazardcayses serious disruption, causing human,

    material, economic or environmental lossesthat exceed the ability to cope of thoseaffected.

    A serious disruption of the functioning of a

    community or a society involving widespreadhuman, material, economic or environmentallosses or impacts which exceed the ability ofthe affected community or society to cope

    using its own resources. (CC Act/PDRRM Act)

    Disaster

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    22/92

    Safety riskslow probability, high consequence, accidental, acute (humansafety focus)

    Health riskshigh probability, low consequence, ongoing, chronic (humanhealth focus)

    Ecological/environmental riskssubtle changes, complex interactions, long latency, macroimpacts (habitat/ecosystem focus)

    Public welfare/goodwill risks

    Financial risks

    Disaster risks

    Climate risks

    Types of risks

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    23/92

    Target population

    Individual RiskSocietal Risk

    ControlVoluntary Risk

    Involuntary Risk

    Risk classification

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    24/92

    Effects

    ChronicAcute

    FrequencyAccidental

    Routine

    Risk classification

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    25/92

    Involuntary/Voluntary

    Immediate/Delayed Direct/Indirect

    Catastrophic/Random Control

    Dread/Familiar

    Factors affecting risk perception

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    26/92

    Conflict

    Nuclear/chemical/biological weapons

    Landmines/unexploded ordnance

    Displacement

    IndustryIndustrial accidents

    Industrial wastes

    Transport Oil spills

    Agriculture and

    unsustainable

    resources

    management

    Overfishing

    Overgrazing

    Deforestation

    Forest fires

    Pest invasion

    Desertification

    Sea level rise/coastal erosion

    Climatic

    Droughts

    Floods

    Typhoons

    Landslides

    Geologic/

    Tectonic

    Tsunamis

    Earthquakes

    Volcanic eruptions

    Man-made

    Natural

    Climatechange

    Geographical

    impacts

    Local

    Regional

    Global

    Timescale

    Sudden

    Slow/

    continuous

    Irreversible

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    27/92

    What can go wrong?How bad are the effects ifsomething does go wrong?How often do these incidentsoccur?

    Risk Assessment

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    28/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    29/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    30/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    31/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    32/92

    Hazard CharacterizationHazard identification

    Hazard inventory

    Frequency Analysis

    Probability of occurrence

    Return period/frequency

    Temporal probability

    Time of occurrence

    Vulnerability probability

    Relative damage

    Probability of injury/fatality

    Risk Estimation/Calculation

    Risk = consequence frequency

    Consequence Analysis

    Elements at risk

    Property

    Support infrastructures (e.g., roads)

    Services

    PeopleSpatial Vulnerability

    Extent/scope of impact

    Impact areas/zones

    Development of OptionsAvoid / Accept Risk

    Reduce likelihood (probability)

    Reduce consequence

    Risk EvaluationCompare to level of tolerability or

    acceptable risk criteria

    Implement, Monitor, Review and

    Evaluate

    RiskAnalysis

    RiskAssessment

    RiskManagement

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    33/92

    High Risk

    Negligible risk

    Unacceptable region

    The ALARP or Tolerability

    region

    (Risk is undertaken only if

    a benefit is desired)

    Broadly acceptable region

    (No need for detailed working to

    demonstrate ALARP)

    Risk cannot be justified

    save in extraordinary

    circumstances

    Tolerable only if risk reduction isimpracticable or if it cost is grossly

    disproportionate to the improvementgained

    Tolerable if cost of reduction wouldexceed the improvement

    Necessary to maintain assurance

    that risk remains at this level

    Risk Criteria/Acceptability

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    34/92

    TYPES OF HAZARD

    Smoking (20 cigarettes per day)Drinking alcohol

    Swimming

    Playing rugby football

    Owning firearms

    Travelling by motor vehicle

    Travelling by train

    Travelling by aeroplane

    Cancer from all causes

    Air pollution from burning coal to generate electricity

    Being at home

    Accidental falls

    Pedestrians struck by motor vehicles

    Homicide

    Accidental poisoning

    Fires and accidental burnsElectrocution (non industrial)

    Falling objects

    Therapeutic use of drugs

    Cataclysmic storms and storm floods

    Lightning strikes

    Meteorite strikes

    RISK OF DEATH

    (chance in a million per year)

    5,000380

    50

    30

    30

    145

    30

    10

    1,800

    0.07 300

    110

    60

    35

    20

    18

    103

    3

    2

    0.2

    0.1

    0.0010.03

    0.19

    Risk of Fatality for Various Activities

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    35/92

    Smoking 1.4 cigarettes

    Spending 1 hour in a coal mine

    Living 2 days in New York or Boston

    Travelling 300 miles by car

    Travelling 10 miles by bicycle

    Flying 1000 miles by jet

    Living 2 months in Denver on vacation from New York

    Living 2 months with cigarette smokerOne chest x-ray taken in a good hospital

    Eating 40 tablespoons of peanut butter

    Drinking 30 12-oz cans of diet soda

    Risk of accident by living within 5 miles of nuclear reactor for 50

    years

    Cancer, heart disease

    Black lung disease

    Air pollution

    Accident

    Accident

    Accident

    Cancer caused by cosmic radiation

    Cancer, heart diseaseCancer caused by radiation

    Liver cancer caused by aflatoxin

    Cancer caused by saccharin

    Cancer caused by radiation

    Activity/exposure Type of Risk

    ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH ONE IN A MILLIONINCREMENTAL RISK OF DEATH IN A YEAR

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    36/92

    LSIR Fatality Risk Contour per Year,Combined Facility (Base Scenario)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    37/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    38/92

    Societal Risks(all events;

    USA)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    39/92

    Societal Risk

    Results

    (Base

    Scenario)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    40/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    41/92

    From theory topractice

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    42/92

    x7.0 ML

    Event Vulnerability

    0

    0.0005

    0.001

    0.0015

    0.002

    0.0025

    0.003

    0.0035

    10 100 1000 10000 100000

    Return Period considered (years)

    Risk-AnnualDamagePercentage

    Mean+1SDcummulativeriskMeancummulativeriskMean-1SDcummulativerisk

    Casualties

    Macro-Economic

    Cost / Recovery

    Indirect Loss

    Direct Loss

    Community Profiles

    System Models

    Geospatial DatabaseRecovery of

    disrupted CI

    asset function

    (% over time)

    Hazard

    Models

    Earthquake, Wind,

    Tsunami, Flood,Blast, Plume, etc

    CI damage

    state estimates

    Physical

    Environment

    affected

    Injuries,

    Fatalities,

    Medical costs

    Real GRP,

    Consumption,

    Employment,

    Investment

    Impact

    footprintover time

    Built

    Environment

    People

    Buildings

    Infrastructure

    Age, Income,

    Employment,

    Activity, etc

    Estimated

    capital

    stock losses

    Business

    resilience Estimatedproductivity

    lossesDisruption induced

    financial costs &

    revenue lossesPopulation affected

    Business

    Residential

    Estimated

    losses

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    43/92

    Administrative Order No. 1(17 September 2010)

    Directing the localgovernment units,

    particularly provinces, toadopt and use in theirplanning activities theguidelines onmainstreaming disasterrisk reduction (DRR) insubnationaldevelopment and landuse/physical planning

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    44/92

    Hazard

    RiskNatural Risk

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    45/92

    Natural Risk

    Hazard

    Risk

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    46/92

    Natural Risk

    Hazard

    Risk

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    47/92

    Hazard CharacterizationHazard identification

    Hazard inventory

    Frequency Analysis

    Probability of occurrence

    Return period/frequency

    Temporal probability

    Time of occurrence

    Vulnerability probability

    Relative damage

    Probability of injury/fatality

    Risk Estimation/Calculation

    Risk = consequence frequency

    Consequence Analysis

    Elements at risk

    Property

    Support infrastructures (e.g., roads)

    Services

    PeopleSpatial Vulnerability

    Extent/scope of impact

    Impact areas/zones

    Development of OptionsAvoid / Accept Risk

    Reduce likelihood (probability)

    Reduce consequence

    Risk EvaluationCompare to level of tolerability or

    acceptable risk criteria

    Implement, Monitor, Review and

    Evaluate

    RiskAnalysis

    RiskAssessment

    RiskManagement

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    48/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    49/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    50/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    51/92

    HazardCharactization

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    52/92

    Flood Hazard Map (Sanaa, Yemen)

    Source: Probabilistic Risk Assessment Studies in Yemen. WB-GFDRR.

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    53/92

    Source: Probabilistic seismic hazard map for Romania as a basis for a new building code. L. Ardeleanu et al. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 5,679684, 2005 (European Geosciences Union)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    54/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    55/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    56/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    57/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    58/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    59/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    60/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    61/92

    Source: NAMRIA

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    62/92

    Frequency Analysis

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    63/92

    FAULT TREEEXAMPLE

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    64/92

    Source: W. K. Kong. Risk Assessment of Slopes (Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology & Hydrogeology; August 2002; v. 35; no. 3; p. 213-222). GeologicalSociety of London. 2002

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    65/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    66/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    67/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    68/92

    Source: Powerpoint presentation. Study Mission to Geosciences Australia (November 2009)

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    69/92

    Basic Procedure

    Determine potentially

    affected population orproperty

    Select/Assign potential Estimate fatality/damage

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    70/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    71/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    72/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    73/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    74/92

    High Risk

    Negligible risk

    Unacceptable region

    The ALARP or Tolerability

    region

    (Risk is undertaken only if

    a benefit is desired)

    Broadly acceptable region

    (No need for detailed working to

    demonstrate ALARP)

    Risk cannot be justified

    save in extraordinary

    circumstances

    Tolerable only if risk reduction isimpracticable or if it cost is grossly

    disproportionate to the improvementgained

    Tolerable if cost of reduction wouldexceed the improvement

    Necessary to maintain assurance

    that risk remains at this level

    Risk Criteria/Acceptability

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    75/92

    Risk PrioritizationRisk Level Description

    Very high risk10-2

    Extensive detailed investigation needed and implementation of

    options essential to reduce risk to acceptable levels; may be too

    expensive and not practicable.

    High risk10-3

    Detailed investigation, planning and implementation of options

    required to reduce risk to acceptable levels.

    Moderate risk10-4

    Tolerable, provided plan is implemented to maintain or reduce

    risks. May require investigation and planning of options.

    Low risk10-5

    Usually accepted. Treatment requirements and responsibility to

    be defined to maintain or reduce risk.

    Very low risk10-6

    Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.

    Source: Adapted from Tonkin & Taylor Ltd., Natural Hazard Management Research Report

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    76/92

    Risk Prioritization

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    77/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    78/92

    DRA Steps

    Earthquake &

    related

    hazards

    Volcanic

    hazardsFlood

    Rainfall-

    induced

    landslide

    Storm surge

    Hazard

    characterizationyes yes yes yes yes

    Source of maps READY project(susceptibility

    map)

    REDAS

    (scenario map)

    READY project

    (susceptibility

    map)

    PHIVOLCS maps

    READY project

    (susceptibility

    map)

    MGB maps

    (1:50,000)

    PAGASA

    (1:10,000

    selected areas

    only)

    READY project

    (susceptibility

    map)

    MGB maps

    (1:50,000)

    READY project

    (susceptibility

    map)

    NAMRIA (1:????)

    Type ofcharacterization

    Single event

    hazard

    Single event

    hazard

    Multiple event

    hazard:

    Frequent, Likely,

    and Rare

    Multiple event

    hazard:

    Frequent, Likely,

    and Rare

    Single event

    hazard:

    Frequent only

    Parameters Spatial extent

    Barangay/Area affected

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    79/92

    DRA StepsEarthquake &

    related

    hazards

    Volcanic

    hazardsFlood

    Rainfall-induced

    landslide

    Storm surge

    Frequency

    analysis

    no no yes yes yes

    Trigger event --- --- Rainfall Rainfall Tropical cyclone

    Type ofcharacterization

    --- --- Multiple eventhazard:

    Frequent, Likely,

    and Rare

    Multiple eventhazard:

    Frequent, Likely,

    and Rare

    Single eventhazard:

    Frequent only

    Climate change no no Yes Yes ---

    Unit of measure --- --- Events per year Events per year Events per year

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    80/92

    DRA Steps

    Earthquake &

    relatedhazards

    Volcanic

    hazards Flood

    Rainfall-

    inducedlandslide

    Storm surge

    Consequence

    analysis

    yes yes yes yes yes

    Coverage Fatalities

    Building and structures

    Critical infrastructures and lifeline services

    Agriculture, fishery and forestry (AFF)

    Exposure data

    (potentially

    affected

    element)

    Fatality:

    Base + boundary + density = population

    exposure map

    Population density by barangay (alternative

    process: data point, e.g., CBMS, HH plot map)

    Unit of measure = # of people

    Building and structures:

    Base + boundary + land use map = structure

    exposure map

    Floor area (alternative process: data point, e.g.,

    CBMS, HH plot map)

    Unit value (construction or building cost per floor

    area)

    Unit of measure = floor area + value

    Critical infrastructures and lifeline services: Base + boundary + land use map =

    infrastructure exposure map

    Point (e.g., school, hospital) and line (e.g.,

    roads) data

    Construction cost per measure (e.g., length,

    floor area)

    Unit of measure = #/length + value

    Agriculture, fishery and forestry:Base + boundary + land use map = AFF exposure

    map

    Land area (categorized by principal/dominant crop

    + forest area)

    Re-planting, re-stocking or reforestation cost

    Unit of measure = land area + value

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    81/92

    DRA StepsEarthquake &

    related

    hazards

    Volcanic

    hazardsFlood

    Rainfall-induced

    landslide

    Storm surge

    Risk estimation no no yes yes yes

    Fatality --- --- Fatality per year

    Property

    damage

    --- --- PhP per year:

    1. Buildings and structures

    2. Infrastructure

    3. Crop and vegetation

    4. Total damage

    Risk

    prioritization

    no no Rating:

    Urgent

    Top priority

    Low priority

    Scoring based on criteria (fatality or value)

    Composite score = sum of risk scores

    Risk evaluation Comparison with other

    hazards only

    Vulnerability analysis as individual

    Vulnerability analysis as community

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    82/92

    Ascertaining Risk Issues and Concerns

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    83/92

    Planning Considerations

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    84/92

    Test validity of key strategies

    given the risks identified:

    key settlements shall have

    major urban functions and

    roles dispersal of socio-

    economic activities to

    identified growth nodes

    emergence of new cities &

    urban areas

    Provide extra incentives to

    investments locating in

    preferred areas for

    agriculture, industrial and

    tourism

    Strengthen backward &forward linkages thru efficient

    physical & economic access

    between raw material source

    & processing areas and

    production & market access

    Enhancing Planning Decisions

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    85/92

    Issues/Problems Goals Objectives Strategies Programs Projects

    Low incomes,

    lack of livelihood

    opportunities

    Increase

    incomes/

    livelihood

    opportunities

    Provide

    employment to

    xx families in

    yy areas.

    Encourage export

    competitive industries

    Export infrastructure

    program

    Port repair project

    (to reduce handling

    costs)

    Regional highwayproject (to support

    export market)

    Skills training for

    export productivity

    program

    Training for

    productivity project

    in yy areas

    Provide microfinance Microfinance

    program

    Pilot micro-finance

    project

    High dropout rate

    for elementary

    school

    Decrease

    elementary

    dropout rate

    Improve

    school

    retention in yy

    areas.

    Improve physical

    access to schools

    Road to school

    improvement program

    Build/repair school

    access road project

    Classroom building

    program in yy areas

    Classroom constn

    in yy areas

    Provide subsidy for

    poor students

    Subsidized school

    lunch program

    Subsidized school

    lunch project in yy

    areas

    Lack of affordable

    housing Provideaffordablehousing

    Provide

    affordable

    housing for xx

    house-holds

    Provide access to

    new housing sites

    New housing road

    access program

    Access road

    construction project

    Improve sites/

    services in yy areas

    CMP program in yy

    areas

    CMP project in yy

    areas

    Private sector-led

    development of

    affordable housing

    Land titling and

    admini-stration

    program

    Land titling project

    in yy areas

    Source: Table 22, page 111 of PDPFP Vol.2

    Enhancing Planning Decisions

    Issues/ Problems Goals Objectives Strategies Programs Projects

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    86/92

    Issues/ Problems Goals Objectives Strategies Programs Projects

    Urban encroach-

    ment into prime

    agricultural lands

    Mitigate

    indiscriminate

    land conversion;

    protect selected

    agricultural land

    Prevent

    unnecessary land

    conversion in yy

    areas

    Encourage urban

    expansion to

    environment-tally

    compatible areas

    Urban expansion

    road program

    Access road

    constn project

    Review and

    update land use

    plans and zoning

    Updated land use

    plans and zoning

    for yy areas

    Improve agri

    incomes to dis-

    courage conversion

    Agricultural

    productivity

    program

    Agricultural

    productivity

    research project

    Flooding Protect

    communities in

    flood prone areas

    Protect xx

    households in yy

    areasProtect and

    rehabilitate

    watershed

    Watershed

    rehabilitation

    program

    Tree planting

    project in yy areas

    Production forest

    project in yy areas

    Provide protective

    infrastructure

    Flood control

    program

    Retention pond

    and dike project

    Relocate or

    discourage

    settlement in

    flood-prone areas

    Provide alternative

    livelihood for

    residents of flood-

    prone areas

    Alternative

    livelihood program

    for flood prone

    communities

    Port expansion

    project (accommo-

    date families in

    flood prone areas)

    Environmentaldegradation

    Curb environ-mental

    degradation

    Significantlyreduce industrial

    discharge into yy

    areas

    Implement existinganti-pollution

    regulations

    Bantay kalikasanprogram

    Environmentpolice project in yy

    areas

    Legislation higher

    pollution penalties

    Encourage use of

    environment friendly

    technology

    Green technology

    program

    Reduced tariffs on

    green technology

    equipment

    Source: Table 23, page 112 of PDPFP Vol.2

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    87/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    88/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    89/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    90/92

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    91/92

    Actions can be grouped into six broad categories:

    1. Prevention. Government administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence

    the way land and buildings are developed and built. Examples include planning and zoning,

    building codes, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and

    storm water management regulations.

    2. Property Protection. Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or structures

    to protect them from a hazard, or removal from the hazard area.

    Examples include acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, storm shutters,

    and shatter-resistant glass.3. Public Education and Awareness. Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials,

    and property owners about the hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions

    include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and

    school-age and adult education programs.

    4. Natural Resource Protection. Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses,

    also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment

    and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest andvegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation.

    5. Emergency Services. Actions that protect people and property during and immediately

    after a disaster or hazard event. Services include warning systems, emergency response

    services, and protection of critical facilities.

    6. Structural Projects. Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the

    impact of a hazard. Such structures include dams, levees, floodwalls, seawalls, etc.

  • 7/29/2019 Module 6_DRA 1

    92/92

    and good day.