selectmen presentation 09-24-11
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
1/52
Duxbury School Building
Committee
Duxbury Middle School
Duxbury High School
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
2/52
School Building Committee
Matt Ali
Barbara Bartlett
Shawn Dahlen Blake Dalton
Joe Grady
John Heinstadt
Neil Johnson
Lee Kennedy
Jon Lemieux
Elizabeth Lewis
Mickey McGonagle Susan Nauman
Gay Shanahan
Andrew Stephens
Dr. Ben Tantillo
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
3/52
Project History
1960 DMS constructed
1968 DHS constructed
March 2009 - TM approves funds forFeasibility study
Spring 2010 Study completed with optionsfor renovation, addition and newconstruction
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
4/52
Current state of DMS and DHS
(per 2010 Feasibility study and NEASC)
Failing systems and aged equipment:Boilers, heating, mechanical, plumbing, electrical and temperaturecontrols require replacement; no longer energy efficient or codecompliant
Deficient components:DMS roof leaks, majority of windows seals and door gaskets failed,insulation deficient, lighting poor
Buildings hinder curriculum and instruction:Classrooms undersized; spread out additions inefficient, can notdeliver AP science lab work; SPED space insufficient, noinfrastructure to support technology, team teaching at DMS not fullyimplemented
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
5/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
6/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
7/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
8/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
9/52
Repair
Repair work of more than 30% assessed value ofbuilding trigger upgrade for codes: ADA, seismic,fire protection, energy compliance
Requires continued requests for design and funding
Would be lengthy and disruptive
Future reimbursement by MSBA unknown
Does not provide improved educational program
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
10/52
Renovation
DMS estimated cost $46.8 million DHS estimated cost $70.5 million
TOTAL $117.3 million
Includes code upgrades and new finishes Improves science labs as structure allows Reimbursement may be less
Phasing, student disruption, modulars One school/one project limit 10 years of work MSBA does not support renovation for Duxbury
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
11/52
Post study
July 2010 MSBA invites Duxbury to modelschool program
March 2011 - TM approves schematic design
funds Spring 2011 OPM and Designer selected
August 2011 Schematic design packagesubmitted to MSBA
September 28, 2011 MSBA Board votes toapprove project for construction
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
12/52
Tasks completed
Educational plan for school and space summary
ADA and code reviews, special educationsubmission
Environmental assessment, traffic, geotechnical, sitesurvey completed
NSTAR memo of agreement executed
Two detailed cost estimates reconciled
Submitted comprehensive schematic design ofschool and field house to MSBA
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
13/52
Public Outreach Efforts
Numerous meetings with school departments
Held 15 public committee meetings since March
Met with SC, DRB, Highway Safety, Public Safety,DRT, Fin Com, Athletics and Rec Departments
SBC hosted 3 public forums: one in June, two in July
(exterior design and green features) and 3 plannedfor October
Attended school open houses
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
14/52
The Design
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
15/52
EXISTING SITE PLAN
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
16/52
SITE PLAN DURING CONSTRUCTION
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
17/52
SITE PLAN FINAL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
18/52
SITE PLAN - OVERALL
EXISTING MIDDLESCHOOL
EXISTING HIGHSCHOOL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
19/52
FIRST FLOOR PLAN
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
20/52
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
21/52
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
22/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
23/52
TYPICAL CLASSROOM RENDERING
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
24/52
LIBRARY RENDERING
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
25/52
EXTERIOR RENDERING - OVERALL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
26/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
27/52
EXTERIOR RENDERING OVERALL MIDDLE SCHOOL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
28/52
EXTERIOR RENDERING - MIDDLE SCHOOL ENTRANCE
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
29/52
TRAFFIC PRE-CONSTRUCTION
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
30/52
TRAFFIC PRELIMINARY POST CONSTRUCTION MS & HS
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
31/52
MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL AND PLUMBING
HEATING
COOLING AREAS WITH AC
LIGHTING
ELECTRICAL
SECURITY
FIRE PROTECTION
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
32/52
GREEN/SUSTAINABLE FEATURES
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
33/52
EXISTING HIGH SCHOOL SITE
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
34/52
SITE PLAN - FORMER HIGH SCHOOL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
35/52
Field House
Existing toilet rooms, locker rooms, maintenancearea and concessions required for continued use ofturf field
Evaluated using portions of existing high school
Cost prohibitive due to adjacencies, code upgradesand premium for selective demolition
Provided new building with utility court requestedby athletics/rec department for existing programs
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
36/52
FIELD HOUSE AND FIELDS OVERALL
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
37/52
FIELD HOUSE FLOOR PLAN
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
38/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
39/52
Educational Advantages
Allows for Team Teaching Interdisciplinary workfosters real life learning
Fosters Project Based Learning 21st Century Skills
Totally Wireless Allows for anytime/anywhere useof technology
Smart Classrooms Interactive hardware & software;flexible seating arrangements
Continuity of Instruction One set of supervisors forthe core subjects
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
40/52
Educational Advantages
Curriculum Alignment Teachers are enabled to meetwith their subject area colleagues on a regular and asneeded basis.
Placement of Teachers Upper level teachers areavailable for middle school students who can beaccelerated in their studies.
Instructional Technology Technology would be
housed in one area, additional services can beprovided such as sharing software and lab utilization.
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
41/52
Educational Advantages
Peer Tutoring High school students could tutormiddle school students as well as act as mentors.
Easier Transition to High School Because themiddle school students will have already been in the
building the transition fears to high school would belessened.
Guidance Services This would allow a betterunderstanding of each individual students needs as
they move through the grades.
Extra Curricular Programs Programs such asmusic and drama can incorporate students from alllevels in concerts and other performances.
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
42/52
Security Enhancements
New Telephone System VOIP in every room
Security Surveillance Inside and outside camerasavailable to police and fire departments
Security Cards Allows students and staff entry atcertain times. Can be used for library and cafeteriapayments
Alarm Systems Up to date systems for fire andsmoke
Entrances Unobstructed view of guests entering thebuilding
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
43/52
Budget
Estimated total project cost $128.4 million, including$1.55 million for schematic design funds
Includes all costs: school and field house, site, FFE,technology, utilities, design, demolition of 2 schoolswith haz mat removal, central office relocation, fieldhouse, testing, contingencies, escalation
Town portion estimated at $77 million, State grant$51.4 million
Value engineering will be undertaken
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
44/52
Soft Costs
Construction management, design oversight,OPM, peer review, CM at risk, filings, legal,insurance, moving
7.5% Design and price contingency
3% CM contingency
4% escalation
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
45/52
State Reimbursement
Base Points 31.0%
Property wealth factor 3.5%
Model school design 5%
Green school 2% Maintenance 1.71%
CM @ risk 1%
TOTAL 45.13%
(Rate of 43.42 cited in March 2011 TM)
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
46/52
Project Cost Breakdown
Eligible costs $113.9 million Ineligible costs, $ 14.5 millionalternate and exclusions
TOTAL COST $128.4 million
DISTRIBUTED Town portion $77 million
State grant $51.4 million
All costs could be lower if project costs decrease.
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
47/52
Ineligible costs
Central office relocation
Field house design and construction
Removal of ACM floor tile
Portion of AE design fees Overages on FFE and technology budget
Escalation
Legal fees
Peer reviews
Permitting costs
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
48/52
Tax Implications
Based on project cost to Town = $77 million
25 year term
Tax increase approximately 11%
Median home valued at $481k = $800/year
Tax increase to begin 2014
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
49/52
Schedule
Approval by 2/3 voters at Oct. 29th TM
Approval by 1/2 voters at ballot on Nov. 5th
Begin CM selection process in January 2012
Complete bid documents by May 2012 forbidding
Single phase begin construction June 2012
Two years to build schools open Fall 2014 Complete demolition and site work by
Summer 2015
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
50/52
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
51/52
Design Fulfills SBC Goals
Cost-effective, educationally sound
Minimizes disruption with single phase build
Separate academic areas for DMS, DHS
Maximizes efficiency with shared spaces(library, cafeteria, arts, athletics, mechanical)
Integrates PAC, preserves Train Field, fits withcampus
Maximizes reimbursement
-
8/4/2019 Selectmen Presentation 09-24-11
52/52
Thank you