por emilio mínguez Ángel esteban manuel gómez guillermo lelra … · 2015-03-30 · todos estos...
TRANSCRIPT
SpISSN 0081-3397
porEmilio MínguezÁngel EstebanManuel GómezGuillermo LelraRafael MartínezJuan Serrano
Toda correspondencia en relación con este traba-jo debe dirigirse al Servicio de Documentación Bibliotecay Publicaciones, Junta de Energía Nuclear, Ciudad Uni-versitaria, Madrid-3, ESPAÑA.
Las solicitudes de ejemplares deben dirigirse aeste mismo Servicio.
Los descriptores se han seleccionado del Thesaurodel INIS para, describir las materias que contiene este in-forme con vistas a su recuperación. Para más detalles consultese el informe IAEA-INIS-12 (INIS: Manual de Indización)y IAEA-INIS-13 (INIS:Thesauro) publicado por el OrganismoInternacional de Energía Atómica*
Se autoriza la reproducción de los resúmenes analí-ticos que aparecen en esta publicación
Este trabajo se ha recibido para su impresión enMarzo de 1, 975,
Depósito legal nQ M-12026-1975
-1. INTRODUCCIÓN.
2. REQUESTED INFORMATION
2.1. Reactor Core Design Data
2.1.1. Nuclear Design Bata
2.1.2. Thermal and Hydraulic Design Data
2.1.3. List of Figures relativa to Core Descripticn
2.2. Additional Data
2.2.1. Reactor Coolant System
2.2.2. Dynamics Data
2.2.3. Instrumentation ans Safety Features
2.2.U, List of Figures relativo to Additiona] Data
2.3. Design Results
2.3.1. Nuclear Design Results
2.3.2. Thermal and Hydraulic Results
2.3.3. Transient and Accident Analysis
2.3.4. List of Figures re latí ve to Design "RP. svlts
2 . >+ . General Requests.
-1-
1. INTRODUCCIÓN.
1.1. Cuando este mismo trabajo se realizo para reactores
de tipo PWR, uno de los principales objetivos fue dar
una descripción detallada de los "parámetros de proyec-
to, que debe suministrar el fabricante del reactor a
las Empresas Eléctricas.
De la laisma forma, ahora se hace extensivo aquel pa-
ra reactores del tipo BWR. Muchos de los parámetros
de diseño son válidos para ambos tipos, por tener
muchas características comunes, üin embargo, las
propiedades físicas del refrigerante obligan a dise-
ños diferentes.
1.2. El grupo de códigos necesario para hacer frente a la
gestión y diseño de elementos combustibles, que de-
be poseer cualquier empresa que se dedique a estas
misiones, tiene q_ue estar compuesta por:
C LEOPARDC LÁSERC ASSAULTC FOG
''C CITATION( NUTRÍ X( NUFLOtíC DTF-IVC TIMOC
i) Nuclear
(BOLERO¿CARAMBA
ii) Termohidráulico .(FQRCIR(FLODISTCFIGRO
iii) Termome cánico CYGRO
iv) Económicos ,, FUEL COST II y IV
(-COSTAX-BWR
v) Cinética .,..,, (SPLOSH(RELAP
Todos estos códigos están disponibles actualmente en la
División de Tecnología de Reactores de la J.E.N. , excep-
to algunos que son restringidos como FIGRO y CYGRO.
1.3. Las necesidades de máquina para el buen uso de estos
programas deben ser las de un computador con una capa-
cidad de memoria de 280.000 palabras o más, tales como
CDC-6600, UNIVAC 1108.
Respecto a los parámetros de proyecto, en este informe
se relacionan aquéllos que creemos son necesarios para
la gestión y diseño de los elementos combustibles, los
cuales han de ser suministrados por el Fabricante del
Reactor, a la firma del contrato.
Nuestro proposito es colaborar con las Empresas Eléctri-
cas Españolas, para que estos parámetros sean exigidos
al Fabricante de la serie de reactores que actualmente
se van a contratar, los cuales, desgraciadamente, no fue-
ron exigidos en el contrato de los anteriores reactores.
Guillermo VELARDE, febrero 1.975
-3-
2. REQUESTED fNFORMAT^ON.
2'1' REACTOR CORE DESIGN DATA
2.1.1. NUCLEAR DESIGN DATA*
Core dará
Reference design thermal powers MWt.
Total weight of UO in core
Total weight of U in core
Circunscribed core diameter
Equivalent core diameter
Effective core volume
Active fuel height
Number of fuel assemblies
Number of control rods
Number of burnable curtains (If any)
Overall core description
From Utilities
Operation sctieduling
Assumed load factor or effective full power days
Replacement energy cost
Technical specifications
Core and Refflectors Structure
H O/U volume ratio Caverage in core)
Dimensions and material composition for;
Core baffle
Core barrel
Thermal shield
" All data specifications are for cold conditions
Radial reflector
Compos ition
Thi ckness
Top reflector
Compos ition
Thickness
Bottom reflector
Comp os ition
Thickness
Fuel Assembly Data
Fuel rod array (specifing enrichment and dishing)
Weight of UO per assembly:
UNDISHEDDISHED
Overall dimensions
Fuel assembly pitch
Nominal active fuel lenght
Fuel element channel CBundle Channel)
Material composition of the box
Thicknes s
Overall lenght
Cross sections dimensions
Channel exit área ratio
End fittings
Material composition
Total weight
Dimens ions
Lower and upper tie plates
Material composition
Lenght
-5-
Spacer grids
Number per assembly
Material composition
Weight of grids per assembly
Dimensions
Drag Coefficient
Puel rods
Number of fuel rods per assembly
Outside diameter
Rod pitch
Ciad thickness
Ciad material
Cladding process
Fuel loading per fuel rods (as UC> )
UNDISHEDDISHED
SPACER
Gap-pellet to ciad, inch
Gap filler gas (composition, pressure)
Lenght of gas plenum, inch
Spacer rod description
Fuel rods with Gd 0 (If any)
Number of fuel rods with Gd 0 per assembly
Loading of Gd 0, per fuel rod (g
Location of part-lenght fuel rods with Gd 0
Height of burnable poison (Gd 0 ) for part-lenght fuel rods
Location of full-lenght rods with Gd 0,
Density of Gd 0
Water rods (If any)
Number per assembly
Material composition
Dimens ions
Location
-6-
Fuel pellets
Material
Density, % of theoretical
Diameter
Height
U-235, initial enrichment
Control rods
Control material composition
Control rod description:
Shape
Blade thickness
Blade span
Cladding thickness of control rod
Number of control material tubes per control rod
Tube outside diameter
TuBe inside diameter
Poison density
Control rods pitch
Control rod location
Absorber active lenght
Temporary control curtains Clf any)
Shape
Material composition
Widthj inch
Thickness, inch
Active control lenght
Curtain locations
-7-
2.1.2. THERMAL AND HIDRAULIC DESIGN PARAMETERS
General Data
Nominal power Mwt
Total core heat output
Heat generated in fuel
Máximum thermal overpower
Nominal system pressure
Fraction of heat generated outside fuel assembly
Fraction of heat generated outside fuel rod but insideassembly
Coolant flow
Total coolant flow rate
Bypass coolant flow rate (feet/seg)
Bypass coolant flow Clb/h)
Dimensions of hypass flow paths
Total coolant flow for heat removal
Coolant flow for heat removal
Quality of recirculation flow
Feedwater flow rate
Nominal assembly coolant flow
Máximum rated assembly coolant flow
Average coolant velocity along fuel rods
Máximum coolant velocity along fuel rods
Core inlet pressure Cminimum)
Pressure drop plenum to plenum
Pressure drop across the inlet nozzle
Pressure drop across the exit nozzle
Pressure drops across the grids
Coolant flow área per assembly
Channel equivalent diameter
Unheated channel lenght at entrance
Unheated channel lenght at exit
Core inlet coolant flow distribution
Water level above riser exit
Riser height
Riser flow área
Riser equivalent diameter
Dowucomer flow área
Coolant Temperature or Enthalpy
Nominal inlet temperature ar rated power
Máximum inlet temperature at rated power
Average rise in vessel at rated power
Average rise in core at rated power
Average temperature in core at rated power
Average temperature in vessel at rated power
Average film coefficient at rated power
Average film temperature difference ar rated power
Feedwater enthalpy
Feedwater temperature
Entrance orifices for fuel assembly
Orifice types
Orifice distribution
Orifice diameter
Entrance loss coefficient
Pressure drop across orifices
Heat Transfer
Average power density
Average specific power
Average lineal heat rate
Rated power
Design overpower
Active heat transfer área
Máximum /Kd<8 (hottest rod)
Average heat flox at rated power
Hot channel máximum heat flux
Rated power
Crude and oxide conductance expected in the ciad
Q ~
Hot Channel Factors
Engineering hot channel factors
a) Heat flux hot channel factor (F )q
This factor should contain subfactors to accoi'Dt for
Variations in pellet diameter
Variations in pellet density
Variations in pellet enrichmert
Excentricity of the pellet
Variations in ciad diameter
b) Enthalpy rise hot channel factor CFA )
H
This factor should contain subfactors to account for
All the effects in part a) aboye
Variations in fuel rod piten
Fuel rod bowing
Fuel assembly bowingFlow redistributioi due to high resistance in hotchannels
Flow mixing inside a fue3 assemblv
Maldis trib ut i or¿ o~. i n .le t assepbly
Overpower factors
Heat balance error
Instrument error
Instrument uncertainly for povrer and te Tnoerat 'jre
Transient overshoot
Instrument dead band
Total design
Mixing Parameters in Channel
Turbulent mixing parameter
Friction factor for divergió? across f]ow
Diversión momentum factor
Turbulent momentum factor
-10-
2.1.3. LIST 0F FIGURES RELATIVE TO CORE DESCRIPTIQN
1. Reactor vessel cutaway
2. Typical core arrangement
3. Core lattice, with U-235 enrichments assembly dis-tribution, and type fuel rods distribution.
4. Fuel rod.
5. Fuel assembly
6. Grids description
7. Temporary curtain (If any)
8. Control rod
9. Fuel bundles with active lenght for burnable poison(If any)
10. Riser description
-11-
2.2. ADDITIONAL DATA
2.2.1. REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM
Reactor Coolant Piping Design Parameters
Design pressure
Operating pressure
Design temperature
Hot leg volume
Cold 1-eg volume
Reactor inlet piping, I.D.
Reactor inlet piping, nominal thickness
Reactor outlet piping, I.D.
Reactor outlet piping, nominal thickness
Reactor Vessel Design Parameters
Design pressure
Operating pressure
Design temperature
Reactor coolant inlet temperature
Reactor coolant outlet temperature
Pressure losses through vessel including nozzles
Reactor outlet plenum volume
Reactor inlet plenum volume
Core bypass volume
Reactor feedwater inlet pressure
Reactor feedwater inlet flow
Reactor feedwater inlet temperature
Core assemblies volume
Total reactor vessel volume
Reactor Coolant Pump Design Parameters
Number of recirculation pumps
Number of jet pumps
Design pressure
Operating pressure
Design temperature
Developped head
Cap aci ty
Re c i r c u l a t i on p ump flovr rate
Charac te r i s t i c curves
Power (naineplate)
Recirculation pumps inlet oressur?
Recirculation pumps inlet '•eaperature
Recirculation pumps outlet oressare
Re circulation pumps ouíleL L c T -- *- 5 A < -
Jet pumps volume
2.2.2. DINAMICS DATA
General Data
Effective prompt neutrón lifstire
Effective delayed neutro1" írac'io- \j gro<-(equilibrium)
Neutrón source strength
Normal heat distribution (r 1 c ' •=> ^̂
ídem for residual heax
Control Rods
Total number of axial steps
Height of each step
Máximum withdrawal speed
Normal withdrawal and insertion soee^
Weight of control rod and drive line
2.2,3. INSTRUMENTATION AND SAFETY FE ATURES
Reactor Trip System CRTS)
Number of safety rod banks
Total insertion time of safety fiaulcs
Instruments, setpoints and time del3,s ofthe Reactor Protection System Ct?ble)
Interlocks in the RTS (table)
Typical secundancy in this ins tr v-^.ei u atior
-13-
Engineered Safety Systems
Setpoints and time delays of the variables which actúatethe high-pressure core aspersión system (table)
ídem for low-pressure aspersión
ídem for the coolant inyection.system
ídem for automatic depressurization of the coolant system
ídem for the Reactor Vessel Isolation System
Number of pumps and/or valves in each system
Water volume and number of tanks feeding ECCS
Number of Dieseis in the Standby Electrical Supply System
Capability of the Residual-Heat Renoval System (water volume,number of pumps¡ nominal flow)
In-Core Neutrón Instrumentation
Number of in-core neutrón detectors (fixed)
Number of in-core detector assemblies
Number of detectors per assembly
Number of Flux Mapping neutrón detectors
Number and type of in-core neutrón sources
Range Cand Number) of Detectors
Source Range Monitor
Intermedíate Range Monitor
Local Power Range Monitor
Average Power Range Monitor
2.2.4. LIST OF FIGURES RELATIVE TO ADDITIONAL DATA
1. Description of bypass flow poths
2. Description of downcomer
3. Steam separator
4. Location of in-core neutrón instrumentation
5. Dimensioned drawing of reactor coolant pumps
6. Distribution of instrumentation for:
a) Loop temperatures
b) Reactor ex-core flux detectors
7. Schematic Diagram of Coolant Systems including isolatingvalves and Safeguards
8. Safety rod insertion vs . time in scram
9. Negative reactivity vs . time in scram (conservative)
10. RTS logic (schematic)
11. ECCS logic (schematic)
12. Vessel pressure vs. flow for high-pressure core aspersión
13. ídem for low-pressure aspersión
14. ídem for the coolant inyection systern
- 1 5 -
2 . 3 . DESIGN RESULTS
2 . 3 . 1 . NUCLEAR DESIGN RESULTS
Isotopic Inventory
Core average burnup at BOC ( i f t h i s i s ' t the f i r s t cycle)
Core average burnup at EOC
Reloading pat tern
Number of fuel assemblies discharged
Average burnup in discharged assemblies
Total U-235 in discharged assemblies
Average U-235 enrichment in discharged assemblies
Total U in discharged assemblies2 39 2 41
T o t a l Pu + Pu in d i s c h a r g e d a s s e m b l i e s
E xce s s re ac t i v i ty .dj^J^rib^utj. qii C at^JB 0 C )
CZP, c lean
HZP3 clean
HFP3 clean
HFPj Xe and S i , equilibrium
Moderator tempe r a t ure _cps¡f f i_c i en t
At 68°F3 A.K/K - °F water (CZP, clean)
Hotj no void3 AK/K - °F water (Xenón and Samarium equilibr-i nr "i
at BOC
at EOC
BOC means Beginning Of Cycle
MOC means M_iddle £f f i r s t £ y c l e
EOC means E_nd Of f i r s t £yc l e
CZP means Cold Zero Power
HZP means H_ot Z_ero Power
HFP means H.ot F_ull Pover
Clean means w i t h o u t f i s s i o n p r o d u c í s (Xe3 Sm, . , . )
CHFP- ip.sans C r i t i c a l Haat Flux R a t i o
-16-
Moderator Void Coefficient
Hot, no void, AK/K - % void
At rated output, AK/K - % void
at BOC
at EOC
Fuel Temperature Doppler Coefficient
At 68°F, AK/K - °F fuel
Hots no void, AK/K - °F fuel
At rated output, AK/K - T fuel
at BOC
at EOC
Poison Burnable «orth, Gd 0 Clf any)
At BOC worth, CAK/K)
Hot
Cold
At EOC worth, (AK/K)
Heat Generation rate inside the rods
Temporary control curtain worth (If any)
At BOC worth, (AK/K)
Hot
Cold
At EOC worth, (AK/K)
Heat Generation rate inside the temporary curtain
Control rods worth
Integral worth of each control rod group:
At BOC, CZP
At BOC, HZP, clean
At BOC, equilibrium Xenón and Samarium
At BOC, HFP, average and máximum void (%)
At EOC, HFP, average and máximum void (%)
-17-
Shutdown margin:
At BOC, HZP
At BOC, HFP, average and máximum void (%)
At EOC, HFP, average and máximum void (%)
Reactivity requirements for control rods
Máximum worth of an stucked rod and resulting radial peakingfactor
Máximum peaking factor and negative reactivity resulting froman inserted rod at full power
Control rod bite and máximum insertion rate
Heat generation rate inside the rods
2.3,2. THERMAL AND HYDRAULIC RESULTS
Sisign Minimum Margin to lncipient Fuel-Clad Damage
Calculated minimum CHFR and suitable correlation
Rated Power
Design iverpower
Steady reactor conditions to give a minimum CHFR
Power
Inlet temperature or enthalpy
Steady reactor to cause fuel centerline melting in hottest rod
Steady reactor power to cause ciad damage due to excesive fueltemperature
Effects of fuel densification on CHFR
Effects of geometry on CHFR
Coolant Temperature or Enthalpy
Average active coolant outlet temperature or enthalpy at ratedp ower
Hot channel outlet temperature or enthalpy
Rated power
Design overpower
Hot channel outlet void fraction
Rated power
Design overpower
-18-
2.3.3. TRANSIENT AND ACCIDENT ANALYSIS
Turbine trip
Closing of main steam isolation valves
Failure of pressure regulator (open or closed)
Loss of a feedwater heater
Misfunctionning of residual heat cooling system (decresingtemperature
Accidental start up of the high-pressure core aspersión systempump
Continuous withdrawal of control rods at power
Continuous withdrawal of rods during start up
Accidental opening of a realief/safety valve
Loss of feedwater flow
Loss of auxiliary electrical power
Trip of the recirculation pumps
Control rod falling (ejected-rod accident)
Ruptures of piping inside containment Closs of coolant accident)
Ruptures of piping outside containment (steam-line ruptureaccident)
Ruptures of feedwater system piping
2.3.4. LIST OF FIGURES RELATIVE TO DESIGN RESULTS
1. Local Power Distribution at BOC (clean; equilibriumXenón and Samarium)
2. Local Power Distribution at MOC
3. Local Power Distribution at EOC
4. Typical Gross Peaking v.s. Exposure
5. Axial Void Fraction Distribution (at BOC, MOC, EOC)
6. Radial Power Distribution and rod pattern
7. Average Axial Power Distribution (at BOC, MOC, EOC)
8. Radial Exposure Distribution (at BOC, MOC, EOC)
9. Axial Exposure Distribution (at BOC, MOC, EOC)
10. Holling Power Distribution Calculations
11. Differential rod worth for each control group, and axialpeaking factor v.s. insertion
12. Reactivity coefficients (Doppler, Moderator temperature,moderator void)
-19 -
13. Ef fec t ive fuel tempera ture v . s . r e l a t i v e power
14. Ef fec t ive fuel tempera ture at HFP v . s . rod burnup
15. Product ion and consumption of h igher i s o t o p e s v . s . burnup
16. Nuclear hot channel f a c t o r s for enthalpy r i s e and forhea t f lux v . s . rod i n s e r t i o n for the d i f f e r e n t con t ro lrod groups
17. Máximum and minimum c o n t r o l group i n s e r t i o n s v . s . powerle vel
18. Thermal conduc t i v i t y of uranium dioxide
19. Cladding i n t e r n a l p r e s s u r e v . s . time
20. Temperature r i s e in the channels of a rod bundle v . s .channel power dens i t y
2 1 . Fuel c ladding and UO temperature l i m i t s v . s . time orfuel bundle exposure
22. Thermal conduc t i v i t y of c ladding
23. Gap heat t r a n s f e r c o e f f i c i e n t v . s . burnup
24. Fuel rod heat f lux l i m i t s v . s . time or fue l feundl^exposure
25. Core i n l e t tempera ture v . s . power l e v e l program
26. Frac t ion of f i s s i o n gases r e l e a s e d to the gap v . s . burnup
27. Diametral gap v . s . burnup
-20-
GENERAL REQUEST
a) Official documents: PSAR3 Tech Specs
b) Main design reports:
Core analysis for cycle 1
Basic lines for fuel management for following cycles
c) P.rogramming of process computer
d) Other studies for:
Fuel manegement analysis in BWR
Historie data on the fuel performance
Behabiour of operating BWR's designed by the vendor
e) Codes for reactor surveillance and processing of in-coreinstrumentation
f) Cooperation for obtaining in-house fuel management capability(computer codess general method, up-dated valúes of empiricalp arametersI.
J . E . N . 297 E . N . 297
Jimia rlc Energía Nuclear, División de locnología de Reactores, Madrid"Información que debe apo r t a r el sumin i s t r ado r dela ca lde ra nuclear (NSSS) p a r a efectuar la gestióndel combust ible de un r e a c t o r del tipo BWR"MINGUI7, C ; ESTEBAN, A . ; GOME, H . ; LEIRA, Q . ; MARTIMEZ, R . ; SRRANO, J . ( 1 9 7 I J )
2 0 p p .S2 relaciona un conjunto do parámetros nucleares, fccrroohídráulicos v mecánicos,
actualizados según los diseños de reactores BWR.
Estos parámetros son necesarios para efectuar la gestión y diseño d.'l combus-t ib le , j) deben ser suministrados por el fabricante del Reactor a la EmpresaEléctrica propietaria del mismo.
Junta de Energía Nuclear, División de Tecnología de Reactores, Madrid
"Información que debe aportar el suministrador dela caldera nuclear (NSSS) para eíectuar la gestióndel combustible de un reactor del tipo BWR"MINGUEZ, L ; ESTEBAN, A . ; 60HEZ, M . ; LEIRA, G . ; MARTINE7, R . ; SERRANO, J . ( 1 9 7 5 )20 p p .
Se relaciona un conjunto de parámetros nucleares, brmohidráulicos y mecánicos,
actuali/aiioo según los diseños de reactores BWR,
Estos paránrlros son necesarios para ^Tectuar la gestión y diseño del combus-t in l r y riebon ser suministrados por el labricanle del Reactor a la Empresa
1'clr ica propietaria del mismo.
J . E . N , 2 9 7
Junta de Energía Nuclear, División di1 Tecnología de Reactoras, Madrid."Información que debe aportar el suminislradoi* dela caldera nuclear (NSSS) para efectuar la gestióndel combustible de un reactor del tipo BWR"MINGULZ, l \ ; ESTEBAN, A.; GOMI/, H.; LEIRA, G.; fWtflNL/, R.; SFRRANO, I. (1975)¿0 pn.
S1 relaciona un conj mío do parámetros nucleares, tormohidráulicos v mecínicos,aciualirados según los diseños de reactores EMR.
rslos parámetros son necesarios para efectuar la gestión y diseño di'l combiib-l i b l e , ) deben si r suininisirados por el fabricante df'l Reactor a la ImnrvsaEléctrica propietaria del mismo.
J . E . N . 297
ínula d' Energía Nuclear, División de Tecnología de Rractores, Madrid"In tormacion que debe apo r t a r el s u m i n i s t r a d o r dela ca lde ra nuc lea r (NSSS) para efectuar Ja gest iónclol combust ib le ele un r e a c t o r del tipo BWR"MINHIJEV, I . ; ESIFBAN, A . ; GÓMEZ, M. ; LEIRA, G . ; M A R 1 I É / , R.; SERRANO, J . (1975)/O |,|..
Sr- n larinna un conj mío de parámetros nuJpqr 's, tu raoh i drául i eos y mecánicos,aHuali adus según los diseños do reaolorrs BWR.
tslos uarámelros son neresarios para " fect inr la gestión y diseño d>J coinbus—l ib io , y cioben :^r suministrados por el fahricaite del Reactor a la Lmnr'sa'1 ' c l r i ca ' iropielaria del mismo.
Clasificación INIS y Descriptora. EJ2.- Bffi Type Roactorc; ; RIHI Managenrn1; Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. [32.- RWR lype Reactors : Tuel Managjntonl;
fnul riemenis; Souci fica+íons; Ruaclor Cores; Diel Assembl les; Reactor Cooling > f'uel Elrmonts; Speci f ications; Reactor Cores; fue! Assembl ios; Reactor Cooling
Systems; Reactor OperaI ion; Mu H i-Parame ler Analysis; Dala; R°ac I or Safety; SVSLPIBS; Reactor Opera t ion; Mu H i-Parame te r Analysis; Dala," Reactor Safety;
Reactor Accidents., Reactor Accidents.
Clarif icación INIS y Descriptores. Ló?.- BWR Type Reactors ; fue! Management; Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. D i . - BWR lype Reaclors; fue! Management;
H.i'l ricinenls; SOL r i f ications; Reactor Cores; fue I Assembl i os; Reactor Cooling Hiél flemenls; Speci f ical ions; Reactor Cores; luel Assemblies; Reac lo r Cooling
Svstonis; Reactor Oporalion; Muí I i-Parameler Analysis; Data; Reactor Safoty; f Syslencí; Reaclor Operation; Muí li-Parameter Analysis; Dala; Reactor Safely;
Reactor An i denU. i Reai lor Accidents.
J.E.N. 297 J.E.N. 297
Jurrta de Energía Nuclear. División.de Tecnología do Reactores, Madrid."Information to be r e q u e s t e d í r o m the NSSS vendorfox- fuel managemen t capabi l i ty for B W R ' s " .MINGUE7, [ . ; ESírBAN, A . ; G0ME7, H . ; LEIRA, G . ; MARÍINFZ, R; SERRANO, J . (1975)20 pp.
A sol of Ihp nuclear, therraaI-hydranlie, and mechanical parameIcrs neccesary
according to Ihe design oí BWR's, is l i s ted .
This parame* lors are noccesary Lo porform thp fue! elemenls management and
design, and i t musfc be suppiiod by the Reactor Hanufactiiror to the U t i l i t y .
Jiinta de Energía Nuclear, División de Tecnología de Reactores, Madrid"Informat ion to be r e q u e s t e d from the NSSS vendorfor fue] managemen t capabi l i ty for BWR's1 1 .MINGIJEZ, E.; ESTEBAN, A.; GÓMEZ, M.; LEIRA, G.; MARTÍNEZ, R.; SERRANO, J . (1975)
20 pp.
A sel of Iho nuclear, thermal-hydraulic, and mochanical parameters necessary
according to the design of BWR's, is l i s ted .
This paramelers are neccesary to perform the fuel elements managomont and
dosign, and i t must be supplied by the Reactor Manufaclurer to the U t i l i t y .
J.E.N. 297
Junta de Energía Nuclear. División de Tecnología de Reactores, Madrid."Information to be r e q u e s t e d from the NSSS vendorfor fue! managemen t capabi]iLy for B W R ' s ' .MINGUEZ, E . ; ESIEBAN, A . ; GÓMEZ, M. ; LEIRA, C ; MARIINEZ, R . ; SERRANO, J . ( 1 9 7 5 )2 0 pp.,
A set of Lhc nuclear, thermal-hydraulic, and raechanical paramelers necessaryaccording lo the design of BWR's, is listed»
This paramelurs are neccesary lo perform the fuel elements management anddtisign, and i b musí be suppliod by the Reactor Manufacturar to tho U t i l i l y .
J.E.N. 297
Junta de Fnergía Nuclear, División de Tecnología de Reactores, Madrid"Informat ion to be r eques t ed from the NSSS vendoi*for fuel managemen t capabi l i ty for B W R ' s " .MIMGUEZ, E . ; ESTEBAN, A . ; GÓMEZ, M . ; LEIRA, G . ; MARTÍNEZ, R . ; SERRANO, J . ( | 9 7 5 )2 0 p p .
A set of the nuclear, thermal-hydraulic, and mechanical paramsters necessaryacrording to the design of BWR's, is Usted.
This pararaeters aro neccesary to perform lhc fuel el ornenIs management anddesign, and 'ú' must be supplied by Ihe Reactor Manufacturer to Iho U t i l i t y .
Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. £Ó?.,- BWR Type Rcaclors; Fucl Managompnt;
funi Clornen te; Soccifications; Reactor Coros; Riel Assomblies; Reactor Cooling
Svslpffls; Reactor Operation; Mulli-ParaiPtur Analysis; Dala; Reactor Sarel-y;
Reactor Accidenta.
Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. £31.- BWR Typc Reactors; Riel Management;
Fucii ü croen Is; Spoci f ications; Reacior Cores; fue! Assemblies; Reactor Cooling
Systems; Reactor Operalion; Muíti-Parameter Analysis; Daia; Reactor Safety;
Reactor Accidente.
Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. Cal . - BWR fype Reactors; Riel Management;Hti-l f ] i ' im jnl ' ; Specificalions; Reactor' Cores; Riel Assemblics; Reaclor CoolingSysloiTi';; Reactor Opuraliun; Huí Li-Pararao'i'r Analysis; Dala; Reactor Safe ty;Reactor Accidents.
Clasificación INIS y Descriptores. C32.- BWR lype Reaclors; Fue! Management;
RIPI floments; Sppcifications; Reactor Cores; Fuel Assemblios; Reactor Cooling
SystoniG; Reactor Operalion; Mullí-Paramo lor Analysis; Data; Reactor Safety;
Reactor Accidento.