jose atilo reyes-herrera, a200 586 985 (bia aug. 29, 2014)

8/11/2019 Jose Atilo Reyes-Herrera, A200 586 985 (BIA Aug. 29, 2014)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/jose-atilo-reyes-herrera-a200-586-985-bia-aug-29-2014 1/7

Reeker, Danil S.4832 S 24th Stret Se 200Omaha NE 68107

U.S. Department of Justice

Executive Ofce r Immigration Rew

Bod of Igo AlO of h Ck

5 /07 Leesburg Pike. Sute 2000Fals Church, Vrgn 20530

HS/ICE Oc of Cief Counse - OMA1717 Avenue HOmaha, NE 68110

Nam: REYSHRRRA JOSE ATLO A 2- 586 985

Dat of this notice 8/29/2014

ncosed s a copy o he Board's decison and order n e aboe-reced case.

Encosure

Pl Mmbs:Grant, Edwar d R.

Sncerely,

Donna CarrCef Clek

Usm Dcket

For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished

Cite as: Jose Atilo Reyes-Herrera, A200 586 985 (BIA Aug. 29, 2014)



'

p Ex O c f m

f B

Flh� V 53

le: 0 586 85 Oma Dae

r: JSE AO YE ak.a Domngo Catna

EMV ROCDG

E

ON BELF ESPT Die Rk Esq

ON BELF OF DHS

PPLICATION Reopng

ahew MorisseyAssitnt Cief Counsel

A 2 9 2014

The respondent, a nv nd citzen o atemala, h ed timel appl o the Imion Judge's decision at Feb 2 2013, dying oton o ren e Depent of Homeld Scit ("DHS led a rpoe bief opposng e apeal The record b remad.

ap, he resond pos iden which as overlooked or mischte e on Judge n pc h s hat hi letter to te Nraska Sprem CouCoune of Discpline did conttte te of a ate plant, d he dd se aco on ror se The Iato Jg may have ovelok e resone om

Ato Eckon Juy 4, 01, wch w aach Respondts Emrgc Moon to tay Remova led with e Imtio Cou on eb 5, 2013 s rspone, cousel dicates his clin w ime-b om applng r am, b de noidit wheth t reli of woldng o removl as dsus Ths shoud b consided

by he Immaon Jdge in th nstc. De to or limted -nng aoy, w nd a rd i a ed

Morver, th moon o r was l js wk byond e 90-day ln ddin rmotions d ihin e 1-day volunty re piod hich a ben ed the Immiaion Jdge on ctor 1, 201. hrere, his i not a c in wch a rpondecl aled to ercse e dilgence i ring his clm , K

406 F.3 1087, 1090 (8 Ci. 00).

F, e resoet ce oee cto o I9 to s moon to reope. e Ion ge cosere e cs e o e plicon dee that te reponen s t ce ibe r a bt er is no dicon we s ise wa adre at te e o g gr tof EF-HL,26 I&N Dec. I 204). Uo rng, ation Jge soul consdr l fosof ref r which e reondent aps eigbe a that ime.




00 586 8

Accodinl e follow od ill be te

Te o is eded to e iio ude fo ocdins and e of a new deiion nise ith the eoi oinion

FR

2




. t

LEE ETHER ESQ.

/..

ITED STATS DEPATMENT OF JCEEXECUTIVE FFICE FR IIGATIN REVEW

TI COURT1717 AVEUE H UITE 100

OHA, N 68110

4832 S 24TH STREET SUTE 20OA 68107

-

THE TTER F

REYE-HERRERA OE ATLO

FE A 20586-985 DATE: Feb 25 213

E T FORWAD NO DRES PROVIDED

' ATTCHED A COPY OF THE DECIO OF THE GTO GE THS DECISIOI FIN ES PPE FILED WITH THE BOD F IIGTIO APPEASWITH 30 CALEDAR DAYS OF THE DATE OF THE AIG OF THS WRITTEN DECIO

EE THE ECOSED FORS STRUCTOS FOR PROPERY PREP YOUR APPEAYO OTICE OF APPEAL ATTACHED DOCUETS FEE OR FEE WAVER REUET

UT E AIED TO ORD OF IIGTO PPEALOFFICE OF THE CERK

PO BOX 850

FL CHCH VA 22041

ATTACHED COPY OF THE DECISIO OF THE IIGTION GE A THE RESTOF YO FAURE TO APPEAR AT YO CHEDUED DEPORTATO OR REOVAL HEARTHIS DECISO S FL ES A OTION TO REOPEN IS FIED N ACCORDCE

WITH SECTIO 22B(c) 3) OF THE ITION TIONALITY CT 8 C

SECTON 252c) 3) N DEPORTATION PROCEEDNGS OR ECTO 240c)6)8 USC SECTO 1229ac} ) REO PROCEEDGS F YOU FLE A OTONTO REPE YOUR OTO UST BE FIED WTH THIS COURT

OTHER

GRATO COT

1717 AUE H SUTE 100OA 81 ·

CC OICE OF CHIEF COSEL DHS77 AE H UE 74OMAHA, E 680

FF



UNITED STATES DEPARMEN OF USTICEEXEUTIVE OFFIE FOR IIGTION VIE

IMMIGRATION COUROMAHA NEBRASKA

Fle# A200-586985

In e Mer o:

Jose REYS Herera

Respde

)

)))

)

Dte ebury 22 2013

IN RMOVALOCEEDINS

AGE Immiion nd Ntion ct ("IA r "he Ac) section212(a(6)(A()Ae presen in e Unted Ses withou ben

dmied r ped

APLICATION Moton o eopen

ON BEAL OF RESPONDENTEsther Lee Esqeeq Law Frm LLC4832 Soh 4h Street Sute 2Om NE 6807

ON BEALF OF HE GOVEMNTPaul R Sulz Deputy Che CnselS Depent o Homelnd SecurityIiatn an Custos Enrceent1717 Aeue H Ste 74Omh NE 68110

C F H MMG J

I Background and Poedural iso

Resonent s a natie and ctizen o Guteml wo entered e Uited Stes whunspection on or bou n unw date at or ne Noles Arzn Exh 1 O October 11 Responent was rante oluary depaure n leu re See Order o themmrtion de espoden ed to eat on r bere Februry 8 2013 s speced bythe Co r his deure As consequece e altete order eo etered by eCour he wrien decision s n See 8 FR § 1241(

On Janu 8 203 Respden submed Moion epen cimn a hs porcounsel ws neecte d erroeousl adsed hm to oluntl et rather tn le a car as ree See Moion t Reopen Resonden's ad The een opposesesponent's Mtio o Reopen See HS Opostion to Respodents Moto to Repe

1



I. eal Standad

A esonden may le one motion to eoen proceedings A § 240( c )(7)(A) 8 R§ 00323(b)() he moion must be led within nine days of the date of en of the naladmnistrave ode of emoval A § 240(c)(7)()(i) 8 R § 00323)() A respondentmay le a moton o eopen edicated upon neecve asssance of counsel See Rayev v. Mukse 536 .3d 853, 860 (8th r. 2008). A respondent alegng that the ineectiveness ohs o her prior consel resulted in a due ocess violaton mus "demonsate boh a damenalprocedua ero and ha the eror resuted n eudice Brac v. Holder 603 3d 027, 1032(8t i. 200) (uong Lopez v Heinauer 332 3d 507, 52 (8h r. 2003)) (ntealquoations omited) o establsh rejudce the respnden mus show "hat the outcome of heproceeding may well have been dieen had there not been any rocedul regulaties Id(uoing Tun v Gonzaes, 485 3d 04 026 (8h ir2007)) (neal quoons oie)

A moion to reoen based on ineecive assistance of cosel does no reqe e

production o new eidence as requed by he regulaons r other types of motions o eoenoweve, suc a motion mus comly wit he sandad establsed by he BA i aer ofLozada See Hernandez-Moran v onzaes 408 3d 496, 499 (8th 2005); Maer ofozada 9 I& ec 637, 638 (BA 988) he procedra euemens ncde () tha hemoton be suorted by an davit of the respoden atestng to the relevnt cts, (2) er coune be inrmed of he aegaons leveed against him or her nd be gven anoppoun to respond, and (3) ha he moion reect whether a complant ha been led waroprate discpnar auhoiies wih espect to an violation of mer cosels etcal orlegal responsibilities and if not, wh no. Id. at 639.

Anaysis and indins

Respondents moton to eoen is unimel. See NA § 240(c)(7)()() 8 ..R §003.23()(). Wen a esponden es a pos decsion motion to reopen duing e eiodallowed olunay depaure, he grant o volunary deaue s tenated automaticaly, andhe alteae orde wl take eect imedaely 8 .R. § 24026(b)()(ii), (iv)

o e extent th he espondent s asserng ha io counse was neective advising hm of al ms of relef 1 the moon to reopen s goveed by he stndds se r n Mater oLozada 9 I& ec 63 7 (BIA 988) We he cuet moton to reopen cons nadvit om he resonden, it does not conain notice o he pror aoey aeging ineectiveasssance of counsel o response See Matter o Lozada 9 &N Dec. a 639. urther, t does

not conain a co of a compain o a sate bar or an eplanaion r wy such complain is notncluded See Accordingy, he Cor nds ha i would not be ope to eoen the caseased on alleged ineectie asssace o counsel

Resondent also alleged ha prior counsl advised him o vountarily dep and wold"always be vey short wih words See Moton o Reoen. Responden led a o 589alcation r slum an wthoding Relef with hs oon o eoen See Moton o Reopen,orm 589 I his aplication, Resonden saed hat uatemala "was recenty subjeced o

1 See Afdavit o Js Rys

2



•\

oribe probem om hucne h "ere w wy o of n ioence See ihe ou n he eion in Reponen' pplicion n he ccompindocmen ken e do no emone pima acie eiibi r um o wreopenn of oceein See 8 R 002(c( INS Ab 485 U.S 94 (988enerl cii ure cme or ocie ioence o no coniue perecuion on ccoun of proeced o ihin he mei of he Ac See Gacia-Colines v. Hole 700 d5 575 (8h ir 0; Nge Ashco 7 d 975 990 ( ir004 (n eidene of ioe ioee enery doe o ome di of peeio

Accorny he lowin orer wi be enere:

IT I ORDERD h Reponen Moion o Reopen i DENID

�

R

Immirion e

jose atilo reyes-herrera, a200 586 985 (bia aug. 29, 2014)

Documents