el programa sociedades seguras en h2020 c...

EL PROGRAMA SOCIEDADES SEGURAS EN H2020

CONVOCATORIA 2016

Infoday UC3M. Leganés, 12 de mayo de 2016

Maite Boyero Representante española y NCP en Sociedades Seguras

[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

2

Contenidos

1. Introducción a la temática

2. Resultados de España en Seguridad

3. Convocatoria 2016 de Sociedades Seguras

4. Recomendaciones prácticas para la preparación de propuestas

5. Información de interés

3

Contenidos






4

Algo de historia sobre el Programa

“European Security Research: The Next Steps” (Sept 2004)

GoP report “Research for a secure Europe” (March 2004)

time2004 2005 2006 2007

“Towards an EU Defence Equipment Policy” (March 2003)

PASR (2004-2006)

European Security Research within FP 7 (2007 and beyond)ESRAB (2005-2006)

ESRAB report“Meeting the challenge: the European Security Research Agenda”(October 2006)

European Security

Strategy

(2003)

5

Investigación en Seguridad en VIIPM La Visión

Desarrollar tecnologías y producirconocimiento que reduzca los gaps de capacidades

Superar la fragmentación de losmercados

Estimular la colaboración entre proveedores de tecnología y usuarios

6

I+D en Seguridad en VII PM

FP 7

Security Research

CBRN

Explosives

2. Security of

infrastructures and

utilities

1. Security of the

Citizens

6. Security and

society

4. Restoring

security and safety

in case of crisis

3. Intelligent

surveillance and

border security

Land Border/

Checkpoints

Sea

Border

citizens and

security

Foresight

Understanding

organisational

structure and

cultures of public

users

Organised

Crime

Counter

Terrorism

Buildings/

Design

Energy/

Transport/

Communication

Grids

preparedness

and planning

Recovery

Surveillance

5. Security systems

integration,

interconnectivity and

interoperability

7. Security

Research

coordination and

structuring

CBRN

Security

Economics

Ethics and justice

Specific

Areas

Mission

Areas

Interoperable

Secure

communication

Security Missions

Cross-cutting

Missions

Information

management

Air

Border

Supply chains

Response

ERA-NET

Pre-normative

research

SME’s

Studies

NCP &

Otehrs

• 1.350 M€ en 7 años

• Más de 350 proyectos financiados

• Progresiva integración de usuarios finales en los proyectos

7

EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation

2014-2020

Essential part of Europe 2020 Strategy

Focus on social challenges which are being faced by the European society,

e.g. the Secure Societies~ 80.000 M€

Simplification Partnerships: Public-Private, Public-Public

International cooperation

8

ICT

Nanotechnology

Biotechnology

Advanced Materials

Advanced Manufacturing& Processing

Space

Access to Risk Finance

Innovation in SMEs

European ResearchCouncil (ERC)

Future and EmergingTechnologies (FET)

Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions on skills, training and career development

European researchinfrastructures

Health, demographic change and wellbeing

Food security, sustainable agriculture and forestry, marine and maritime and inland water research and the bioeconomy;

Secure, clean and efficient energy;

Smart, green and integrated transport;

Climate action, environment, resourceefficiency and raw materials

Secure Societies: Protecting freedom and security of Europe and its citizens

Europe in a changing world-Inclusive, innovative and reflexive societies

ExcellentScience

SocietalChallenges

Industrial Leadership

Programa Marco de Investigación e Innovación (2014-2020)

1.613 M€

Seguridad en H2020: SOCIEDADES SEGURAS

9

Secure Societies REGULATION (EU) 1291/2013 establishing Horizon 2020

The specific objective is to foster secure European societies in a context of unprecedented transformations and growing

global interdependencies and threats, while strengthening the European culture of freedom and justice. • Europe has never been so peacefully consolidated, and the levels of security enjoyed by European citizens are high compared to other parts of the world. However,

Europe's vulnerability continues to exist in a context of ever-increasing globalisation in which societies are facing security threats and

challenges that are growing in scale and sophistication.

• The threat of large-scale military aggressions has decreased and security concerns are focused on new multifaceted, interrelated and transnational threats. Aspects such as

human rights, environmental degradation, political stability and democracy, social issues, cultural and religious identity or migration need to be taken into

account. In this context the internal and external aspects of security are inextricably linked. In order to protect freedom and

security, the Union requires effective responses using a comprehensive and innovative suite of security instruments. Research and innovation can

play a clear supporting role although it cannot alone guarantee security. Research and innovation activities should aim at understanding, detecting,

preventing, deterring, preparing and protecting against security threats. Furthermore, security presents fundamental challenges that cannot be resolved by independent and sector-specific treatment but rather need more ambitious, coordinated and holistic approaches.

• Many forms of insecurity, whether from crime, violence, terrorism, natural or man-made disasters, cyber-attacks or privacy abuses, and other forms of social and economic disorders increasingly affect citizens. According to estimates, there are likely to be up to 75 million direct victims of crime every year in Europe ( 1 ). The direct cost of crime,

terrorism, illegal activities, violence and disasters in Europe has been estimated at least EUR 650 billion (about 5 % of the Union GDP) in 2010. Terrorism has

shown its fatal consequences in several parts of Europe and worldwide costing many lives and important economic losses. It also has a significant cultural and global impact.

• Citizens, firms and institutions are increasingly involved in digital interactions and transactions in social, financial and commercial areas of life, but the development of

Internet has also led to cyber crime worth billions of Euros each year, to cyber-attacks on critical infrastructures and to breaches of privacy affecting individuals

or entities across the continent. Changes in the nature and perception of insecurity in everyday life are likely to affect citizens' trust not only in institutions but also in each

other. In order to anticipate, prevent and manage these threats, it is necessary to understand the causes, develop and apply

innovative technologies, solutions, foresight tools and knowledge, stimulate cooperation between providers and users, find civil security solutions, improve the competitiveness of the European security industry and services, including ICT, and prevent and combat the abuse of privacy and breaches of human rights in the Internet and elsewhere, while ensuring European citizens' individual rights and freedom.

To enhance better cross-border collaboration between different kinds of emergency services, attention should be given to interoperability and standardisation. Finally, as

security policies should interact with different social policies, enhancing the societal dimension of security research will be an

important aspect of this societal challenge.

10

Seguridad: un reto industrial

La industria de la seguridad es uno de los sectores con mayor potencial para el crecimiento y el empleo en la UE. En 2011, el sector empleaba a 180.000 personas, con una facturación anual de aproximadamente € 30 mil millones.

El programa de Seguridad ayudará a:

– Superar la fragmentación del mercado a través de las normas en toda la UE

– Reducir la brecha entre la investigación y la llegada al mercado de soluciones mediante la introducción de nuevos sistemas de financiación, tales como la contratación pre-comercial (PCP)

– Mejorar la integración de los aspectos sociales mediante la evaluación del impacto de las tecnologías de seguridad en materia de derechos fundamentales

11

Implicación de distintos stakeholders

La seguridad es un tema que sólo se puede abordar con eficacia si todas las partes interesadas cooperan. Representantes de los sectores público y privado deben trabajar en cooperación.

Así, los programas de trabajo están dirigidos a: – Empresas privadas

– Asociaciones industriales, centros tecnológicos, grupos de investigación

– Actores institucionales

12

The European Agenda on SecurityCOM(2015) 185 final (28 April 2015)

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/index_en.htm

The European Agenda on MigrationCOM(2015) 240 final (13 May 2015)

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/index_en.htm

Políticas de la UE relacionadas con la temática I

Securing EU bordershttp://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/securing-eu-borders/index_en.htm

A number of proposed legislative initiatives including the proposal for a European Border and Coast Guard (15 December 2015)

Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: An Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace COM (2013) 1

Promoting a single market for cybersecurity productshttp://eeas.europa.eu/policies/eu-cyber-security/cybsec_comm_en.pdf

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/index_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/securing-eu-borders/index_en.htm

http://eeas.europa.eu/policies/eu-cyber-security/cybsec_comm_en.pdf

13

2008 EU Action Plan on Enhancing the Security of Explosives

Regulation (EU) No 98/2013 on the marketing and use of explosives precursors

Towards a stronger European disaster response: the role of civil protection and humanitarian assistance, COM(2010)600

EU Action Plan on combating terrorism

The Security Industry Policy Action Plan COM (2012)417 final

Políticas de la UE relacionadas con la temática II

14

EU Strategy and Action Plan for customs risk management (COM (2014) 527 final)

The EU Strategy towards the eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings 2012–2016, COM(2012) 286

European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP), COM(2006)786

Civilian Headline Goal 2008 (15863/04)

EU Maritime Security Strategy (11205/14) and its action plan (17002/14)

EU Civil Protection Mechanism (Decision 1313/2013/EU)

Políticas de la UE relacionadas con la temática III

15

Objetivos y áreas que cubre el programa

Lucha contra la delincuencia, el crimen y el terrorismo

Recuperación de Europa frente a crisis y desastres

Seguridad cibernética

Protección y resiliencia de infraestructuras críticas, modos de transporte y cadenas de suministro

Mejorar la seguridad y la gestión de las fronteras

Seguridad en el exterior, en misiones civiles

Aspectos sociales, éticos, de privacidad y libertad de los

ciudadanos

Estandarización e interoperabilidad de sistemas

16

Particularidades del programa

2 DGs aportan financiación: DG HOME y DG CONNECT

Orientación a USUARIO FINAL (Practitioners)

Proyectos cercanos a mercado (TRL 4 a 7)

Aplicación civil, exclusivamente

Algunos proyectos resultarán clasificados

Estandarización y certificación de soluciones y demostración de resultados

Aspectos éticos de los proyectos

17

Contenidos






18

Seguridad en el VII Programa Marco

• 1.350M€ invertidos en 7 años de programa (2007-2013)• España se consolidó como 5º país• Buena participación tanto en proyectos grandes como pequeños• Excelente participación de la industria (+45% ppto). Los usuarios

finales se implicaron muy activamente en las últimas convocatorias.

FP7-SEC: Resultados de las 6 convocatorias + Convocatoria SEC/ICT

Financiación actividades

Financiadas España (% del total) 166 (52,4%)

Coordinadas España (% del total) 30 (9,5%)

Retorno económico (España)

Millones de € 118,19 M€

Retorno (% UE) 9,55 %

Retorno (% del total) 8,7 %

19

Sociedades Seguras, H2020Programa de trabajo 2014-2015

Gestión de crisis y desastres, incl.

Cambio climático

Lucha contra el crimen y el terrorismo

Seguridad fronteriza y seguridad en el

exterior

Seguridad digital / Ciberseguridad

400 M€

NEW

NEW

20

Particularidades PT 2014-2015

• Presupuesto/ranking lists por convocatoria, no por topic (excepto topics DS)

• Topics “huérfanos”, sin propuestas financiadas, mientras otros han tenido varias propuestas

• Topics muy genéricos, podían llevar a “interpretación”

• Alta competencia (tasas de sobre-suscripción entre 10 y 12 veces)

• No habido condiciones de elegibilidad

21

Resultados de España en convocatoria 2014*

Resultados provisionales de las 4 convocatorias (DRS, FCT, BES y DS)

Financiación actividades Financiadas España (% del total) 24 (58,5%)

Coordinadas España (% del total) 4 (9,8%)

Retorno económico (España)

Millones de € 12,67 M€

Retorno (% UE) 7,6 %

Retorno (% del total) 6,9 %

* Información no definitiva

WP 2014: 25 topics, ~ 200M€. 49 proyectos financiados

Global oversubscription rate: 9,86

22

Convocatoria 2014: resultados por países

0,00%

2,00%

4,00%

6,00%

8,00%

10,00%

12,00%

14,00%

16,00%PRESUPUESTO SOLICITADO

RETORNOS OBTENIDOS

0,00%

2,00%

4,00%

6,00%

8,00%

10,00%

12,00%

14,00%

16,00%

18,00%

España queda en el 6º puesto, tras: UK (15,9%), DE (11%), IT(9,5%),

GR(8,9%) y FR(7,6%)

23

Resultados provisionales convocatoria 2015

24

Desglose del presupuesto

BES; 42,17

DS; 50,21

FCT; 42,16

DRS HOME, 61.73

DRS RTD (Climate

Action), 28

DRS, 89.73

Budget 2015: 224.27 M€ *

* Including SME challenge (7.4 M€) but not FTI (3.92 M€)

25

H2020-Secure Societies-2015Propuestas por “ranking list”

*DRS: all except topics DRS-09, 10 & 11**DS-07: including 1 ineligible proposal with 62MEUR funding

26

Proposals were submitted under all topics

Cobertura por topic

Topic nr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

BES 7 18 1 5 9 14 5 9 11 3 10

DRS 37 10 4 14 6 44 16 21 28 8 1 8

DS 28 38 24 12

FCT 15 9 31 12 15 9 25 22

27

Resultados de la evaluación

Global Success Rate: 8.0%

In the call 2014 it was 9.2%

0

50

100

150

200

250

BES DRS DS FCT

Rejected Reserve Main

Rejected Reserve MainBES 81 1 10DRS 179 4 14DS 88 4 10FCT 125 1 9Total 473 10 43

28

Resultados convocatoria 2015*

• España queda como 1er país, en términos de retorno, en esta convocatoria (14,6% retorno total, 15,45% UE)

• 4 topics desiertos (provisional)

• Alta participación de PYMES (a nivel global) y de usuarios finales – especialmente EXTRAORDINARIA participación del MINISTERIO DEL INTERIOR (1er participante a nivel global)

• España, en principio, va a coordinar 8 proyectos (el doble que en 2014)

* Datos provisionales

29

Conclusiones

• Valor de los usuarios finales en los consorcios

• Las propuestas deben trabajarse con MUCHA antelación

• Ha aumentado significativamente la calidad de las propuestas

• Recomendamos contactar con los NCPs y la delegación durante la preparación de la propuesta

30

Contenidos






31

Programa de trabajo 2016-2017

Soluciones pan-Europeas para problemas pan-Europeos

• Contribuir a las implementación de las últimas políticas Europeas de Seguridad

• Fomentar la “Europeanización” de los usuarios finales (practitionners) que demandan soluciones innovadoras a la industria Europea

• Combinar las amenazas físicas y ciber-amenazas de seguridad

• Aumenta el número de PCPs

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617-security_en.pdf


32

Novedades que cabe destacar

• Nuevas condiciones de elegibilidad -> “Europeanización” de los usuarios finales (deberán ser integrados directamente en la propuesta como SOCIOS!!)

• Presupuesto por topic (no por convocatoria)

• Importancia de los PCPs (se financian al 90%)

• Lanzamiento de una cPPP en Ciberseguridad en la segunda mitad de 2016, que se integrará en el programa a partir de 2016

33

Condiciones de elegibilidad (ejemplo)

SEC-12-FCT-2016: Technologies for prevention, investigation and mitigation in the context of fight against crime and terrorism

a) In Sub-topic: 1, Sub-topic: 2 or Sub-topic: 3: a minimum of 3 Law enforcement agencies (LEA) from 3 EU Member States or Associated Countries must be beneficiaries of the grant agreement and should be directly involved in the

carrying out of the tasks foreseen in the grant.

b) In other fields (Sub-topic: “Others”): a minimum of 5 LEA from 5 EU Member States or Associated Countries must be beneficiaries of the grant agreement and should be directly involved in the carrying out of the tasks foreseen in the grant.

c) Proposals on detection technologies are excluded from this topic.

d) Any proposal must include a workpackage for field demonstrations.

Only the sub-topics not covered in 2016 will remain eligible in 2017. A list of topics that remain eligible in 2017 will be published in due time in the section "Topic

Conditions & Documents" for this topic on the Participant Portal.

34

Presupuesto por topic

Cómo se aplica? Objetivos?

Reducción de los “topics huérfanos”

Menor duplicidad en proyectos

Mejorar el apoyo a la implementación de políticas

Evitar la competencia entre distintos tipo de proyecto (CSA vsRIA/IA)

Reducción del sesgo en determinadas áreas científicas

Cuándo se aplica? En casi todos los topics, aunque hay algunas pequeñas

excepciones en las que varios topics comparten presupuesto

35

Estructura del PT 2016-2017

3 convocatorias paralelas/ separadas:

Critical Infrastructure Protection• Combinación de amenazas ciber y físicas, enfocándose en distintossectores críticos

Security• Disaster resilient societies

• Fight against crime and terrorism

• Border and External security

• General Matters

Digital Security Focus Area• ICT, Secure societies and eHealth

2016: Abre: 15 Mar 2016, Cierra: 25 Ago 20162017: Abre: 01 Mar 2017, Cierra: 24 Ago 2017

~ 380 M€

36

Budget: €382,36 million 2016=M€185; 2017=M€197

3 Calls & 30 topics:

• CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION – CIP (1 topic)(2016=M€20;2017=M€20)

• SECURITY – SEC (2016=M€113; 2017=M€121):

o Disaster-resilience: safeguarding and securing society – DRS (5 topics)

o Fight against Crime and Terrorism – FCT (7 topics)

o Border Security and External Security – BES (8 topics)

o General Matters – GM (1 topic)

• Digital Security Focus Area – DS (5 topics) (2016=M€29; 2017=M€36)

SME Instrument (2016=M€15; 2017=M€14)

Fast track to Innovation – Pilot (2016=M€4)

Other Actions (2016=M€15; 2017=M€14)

WP 2016-2017 – Desglose del Presupuesto


37

Calendario

Publication

14/10/15

Opening

15/03/16Deadline 25/08/16

Remote Evaluation (IER)

12/09/16 – 30/09/16

Evaluation in Bxl

(CR)

03–21/10/16

Panel Meeting

(ESR)

October 2016

Remote

Ethics Screening

17/10-03/11

CMs

Ethics Screening

7-11/11/2016

Security Scrutiny

Nov-Dec 2016

Information to Programme

Committee and to applicants

+ Review Jan 2017

Grant Preparation+

Programme Committee consultation

Feb-April 2017

Start of projects

from

May 2017

38HORIZON 2020

38

CIP-01-2016-2017: Prevention, detection, response and mitigation of the combination of physical and cyber threats to the critical infrastructure of Europe.

ToA Funding

(M)

Ind.Budget

(M)

TRL Scope

IA 20.0 8.0 7 Critical Infrastructures:

• Water Systems

• Energy Infrastructure (power plants and distribution)

• Transport Infrastructure and means of transportation

• Communication Infrastructure

• Health Services

• Financial Services.

Should cover: prevention, detection, response, and (in case of failure)

mitigation of consequences over life span CI, achieving security &

resilience of all functions performed by the installations, and of

neighbouring populations and the environment.

The participation of SMEs is strongly encouraged.

international cooperation

Max.1 project will be selected per CI

Installations not covered in 16 will remain eligible in 17

Eligibility and admissibility cond.:

At least 2 operators of the chosen type

of critical infrastructure operating in 2

countries must be beneficiaries

(possibly, but not necessarily:

coordinator) of the GA and should be

directly involved in the carrying out of

the tasks foreseen in the grant.

The participation of industry able to

provide security solutions is required.

WP 2016-2017Call - CIP

Topics

39

Call - SECURITY (1)Disaster-resilience: safeguarding and securing society

WP 2016-2017Topics

•Objective:

•To reduce the loss of human life, environmental, economic and material damage from natural and man-made disasters, including from extreme weather events, crime and terrorism threats.

SEC-01-DRS-2016: Integrated tools for response planning and scenario building SEC-02-DRS-2016: Situational awareness systems to support civil protection

preparation and operational decision making SEC-03-DRS-2016: Validation of biological toxins measurements after an

incident: Development of tools and procedures for quality controlSEC-04-DRS-2017: Broadband communication systems (DG HOME) SEC-05-DRS-2016-2017: Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN)

cluster (DG HOME)

40

SEC-01-DRS-2016: Integrated tools for response planning and scenario building

Disaster risks (natural/accidental/intentional) addressed in the context of: EU Civil Protection Mechanism (Decision 1313/2013);

the IPCC recommendations to extreme climatic events;

the Sendai Framework

IA / 8 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 8 MEUR / TRL 7 or 8

Participation SMEs is strongly encouraged


At least 1 from each of the 5 categories of FR (firefighting units; medical emergency services;police departments; civil protection units; control command centres).

SEC-02-DRS-2016: Situational awareness systems to support civil protection preparationand operational decision making

Identify new and promising solutions, develop and agree on the core set of specifications of aspecific system, on the roadmap for research still needed, and related tender documents tobase future procurements.

The EU may contribute to subsequent actions (PCP, PPI, others)

CSA / 1,5 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 1,5 MEUR

Max 1 proposal funded


WP 2016-2017Topics

41

SEC-03-DRS-2016: Validation of biological toxins measurements after an incident:Development of tools and procedures for quality control

Develop quality control tools, as well as the Standard Operating Procedures necessary forestablishing a mechanism to systematically validate laboratory-based measurement techniques,including sample preparation strategies and analyses made in-situ issued by mobile and quicklydeployable laboratories, which should be proposed for adoption at EU level.

IA / 8 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 8 MEUR

At least 3 control laboratories from different MS/AC

SEC-05-DRS-2016-2017: Chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) cluster(DG HOME)

Part a) Issue list of technologies to be developed to integrating them into the platforms(building inventory EDEN project). The CSA will deliver the first version of the catalogue on timefor use in the implementation of Part b) - RIA

CSA / 2 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 2 MEUR

Additional exploitation obligation

WP 2016-2017Topics

42

WP 2016-2017Topics

•Objective:

•To mitigate potential consequences of incidents, or to avoid them by using new technologies and capabilities for fighting and preventing crime (including cyber-crime), illegal trafficking and terrorism (including cyber-terrorism), including understanding and tackling terrorist ideas and beliefs, whilst respecting human rights and privacy.

SEC-06-FCT-2016: Developing a comprehensive approach to violent radicalization in the EU from earlyunderstanding to improving protection

SEC-07-FCT-2016-2017: Human Factor for the Prevention, Investigation, and Mitigation of criminal andterrorist acts

SEC-08-FCT-2016: Forensics techniques on: a) trace qualification, and b) broadened use of DNA SEC-11-FCT-2016: Detection techniques on explosives: Countering an explosive threat, across the timeline of

a plot SEC-12-FCT-2016-2017: Technologies for prevention, investigation, and mitigation in the context of fight

against crime and terrorism SEC-09-FCT-2017: Toolkits integrating tools and techniques for forensic laboratories (DG HOME) SEC-10-FCT-2017: Integration of detection capabilities and data fusion with utility providers’ networks

Call - SECURITY (2)Fight against crime and Terrorism

43

RIA / 17 MEUR / Ind. budget: 3 MEUR


"Practitioners (including LEA) from at least 5 MS/AC"

SEC-06-FCT-2016: Developing a comprehensive approach to violent radicalization in the EU fromearly understanding to improving protection

Focus on developing policy recommendations and practical solutions to be implemented bysecurity end-users vs SC 6 focuses on studying the phenomenon of radicalization to provideinput to policy-making.

SEC-07-FCT-2016-2017: Human Factor for the Prevention, Investigation, and Mitigation ofcriminal and terrorist acts

5 Sub-topics: New methods for protection of crowds; prevent, investigate and mitigatecybercriminal behaviours; pim corruption and financial crime; pim petty crimes; pim domesticviolence.

Only sub-topics not covered in 2016 will be eligible in 2017

Max 1 proposal funded per sub-topic

Must include a WP for practical demonstrations.

WP 2016-2017Topics

44

RIA / 27,25 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 5 MEUR

SEC-08-FCT-2016: Forensics techniques on: a) trace qualification, and b) broadened use of DNA

TRL 5 / International cooperation

Forensic laboratories/institutes from minimum 5 MS (additional AC is encouraged)

Max 1 proposal funded for part a) and part b)

SEC-11-FCT-2016: Detection techniques on explosives: Countering an explosive threat, acrossthe timeline of a plot

Coordination with EDA activities

Practitioners in the field of counter-terrorist activities from at least 3 MS/AC

SEC-12-FCT-2016-2017: Technologies for prevention, investigation, and mitigation in the contextof fight against crime and terrorism

TRL 6

Only sub-topics not covered in 2016 will be eligible in 2017

Max 1 proposal funded per sub-topic

Sub-topics 1-2-3 at least 3 LEA MS/AC (S-t others: at least 5)

Detection technologies are excluded

Must include a WP for field demonstrations

WP 2016-2017Topics

45

Call - SECURITY (3)Border Security and External Security

SEC-13–BES–2017: Next generation of information systems to support EU external policies

SEC-14-BES–2016: Towards reducing the cost of technologies in land border security applications

SEC-15-BES–2017: Risk-based screening at border crossing

SEC-16-BES–2017: Through-foliage detection, including in the outermost regions of the EU

SEC-17-BES-2017: Architectures and organizations, big data and data analytics for customs risk management ofthe international goods supply chain trade movements

SEC-18-BES–2017: Acceptance of "no gate crossing point solutions"

SEC-19-BES-2016: Data fusion for maritime security applications

SEC-20-BES-2016: Border Security: autonomous systems and control systems

WP 2016-2017Topics

•Objective:

•Improve border security, respecting human rights and privacy. Including control and surveillance issues, contributing to the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR) and promoting use of new technology for border checks, in relation to the Smart Borders legislative initiative.

•Support the Union's external security policies in civilian tasks.

46

SEC-14-BES–2016: Towards reducing the cost of technologies in landborder security applications

RIA

10 MEUR

Ind. Budget: 5 MEUR

Overlap with EWISA project should be avoided


Enhanced SME participation

TRL 6

At least 3 border guard authorities from 3 different EU/Schengen MS

WP 2016-2017Topics

47

IA / 24 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 8 MEUR


SEC-19-BES-2016: Data fusion for maritime security applications


TRL 7

At least 3 border guard authorities from 3 MS/AC

At least 3 independent industry organizations from 3 different MS/AC.

SEC-20-BES-2016: Border Security: autonomous systems and control systems

Cover 1 sub-topic:

1. Autonomous surveillance

2. Enhanced command and control systems for the surveillance of borders in a 3Denvironment Autonomous surveillance

SMEs is strongly encouraged

TRL 6 or 7

Practitioners from various disciplines, including Border guard authorities from at least 5EU/Schengen MS

WP 2016-2017Topics

48

General Matters SEC-21–GM-2016-2017: Pan European Networks of practitioners and other actors in the field of security (DG HOME)

WP 2016-2017Topics

Practitioners: e.g. firefighters, police and intelligence communities, border guards, custom authorities, explosive specialists, forensic laboratories, medical emergency teams, etc.

4 different categories of networksa. Same discipline and from across Europeb. From different disciplinesc. From around Europe that manage demonstration and testing sites, training facilities,

including simulators or serious gaming platforms in the area of CBRN and for first responders or civil protection practitioners

d. Consortium of formally nominated NCPs in the area of security research (2017) CSA 15,5 MEUR (2016) Indicative budget: 3,5 MEUR (a, b & c) / duration 5 years Additional Eligibility/Admissibility condition (several including):

- For part a) & c): Practitioner participation from at least 8 MS/AC- For part b): Practitioner participation from at least 2 MS/AC from outside the region.

49

Call – DIGITAL SECURITY FOCUS AREA

DS-01-2016: Assurance and Certification for Trustworthy and Secure ICT systems,services and components (LEIT–ICT)

DS-02-2016: Cyber Security for SMEs, local public administration and Individuals /IA-22 MEUR

DS-03-2016: Increasing digital security of health related data on a systemic level (SC1"Health, demographic change and wellbeing")

DS-04-2016: Economics of Cybersecurity / RIA-4 MEUR

DS-05-2016: EU Cooperation and International Dialogues in Cybersecurity andPrivacy Research and Innovation (DG CNECT) / CSA-3 MEUR (2-0.5-0.5) / Strand 1: 4year duration / Max 1 proposal funded per strand

DS-06-2017: Cryptography (LEIT–ICT)

DS-07-2017: Addressing Advanced Cyber Security Threats and Threat Actors

DS-08-2017: Privacy, Data Protection, Digital Identities

WP 2016-2017Topics

50HORIZON 2020

50

DS-02-2016: Cyber Security for SMEs, local public administration and Individuals

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

51HORIZON 2020

51


Considering the adequate level of security commensurate with the considered use-case, proposals may address one type of end-user: SMEs, local PA, individual citizens.

Basic cyber security threats

Organisation size and budgetary constraints

Individuals, the "weakest link“?

Human factors, behaviour

Innovative solutions: usability, automation

Consider: guidance, best practices and standards

Validation: end-user feedback

Encouraged to include public and/or private security end-users

TRL 6 or 7

IA / 22 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 3-4 MEUR

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

52HORIZON 2020

52

DS-04-2016: Economics of Cybersecurity

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

53HORIZON 2020

53

DS-04-2016: Economics of Cybersecurity

[...] combining methods from microeconomics, econometrics, qualitative social sciences, behavioural sciences, decision making, risk management and experimental economics.

1. Cost-benefit

Intangible assets, metrics, optimal investment, insurance

2. Incentives and business models

Incentives, cooperative and regulatory approaches

Information security markets (e.g. bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure)

Revenue models for criminal activity

Institutional innovation

RIA / 4 MEUR / Ind. Budget: 1-2 MEUR

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

54HORIZON 2020

54

DS-05-2016: EU Cooperation and International Dialogues in Cybersecurity and Privacy

Research and Innovation

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

55HORIZON 2020

55

DS-05-2016: EU Cooperation and International Dialogues in Cybersecurity and Privacy Research and Innovation (CNECT)

A better overview of EU, MS and regional activities.

Exchange of views on global level; promote EU stakeholder participation.

May cover one of the three strands (CSAs)

1. Synergies between H2020, EU Member States and associated countries R&I activities and cybersecurity innovation clusters.

4 years (2014/15 + 2016/17) / Ind. Budget: 2 MEUR

2. International dialogue with Japan / Ind. Budget: 0,5 MEUR

3. International dialogue with the USA / Ind. Budget: 0,5 MEUR

3 MEUR

Only the best proposal may be funded for strands 1, 2

& 3.

WP 2016-2017 – Call DS

56

CIP-01-2016-2017: Prevention, detection, response and mitigation of the combination of physical and cyber threats to the critical infrastructure of Europe

SEC-01-DRS-2016: Integrated tools for response planning and scenario buildingSEC-02-DRS-2016: Situational awareness systems to support civil protection

preparation and operational decision makingSEC-06-FCT-2016: Developing a comprehensive approach to violent

radicalization in the EU from early understanding to improving protectionSEC-07-FCT-2016-2017: Human Factor for the Prevention, Investigation, and

Mitigation of criminal and terrorist actsDS-02-2016: Cyber Security for SMEs, local public administration and IndividualsDS-04-2016: Economics of CybersecurityDS-05-2016: EU Cooperation and International Dialogues in Cybersecurity and

Privacy Research and Innovation

Secure Societies SSH flagged topics

57

Secure Societies Gender flagged topics

SEC-06-FCT-2016: Developing a comprehensive approach to violent radicalization in the EU from early understanding to improving protection


58

Cybersecurity contractual Public-Private Partnership (cPPP)

• Estimular las capacidades de competitividad e innovación de la industria de la seguridad digital y la privacidad en Europa

• Garantizar un suministro sostenido de productos y servicios innovadores de seguridad cibernética en Europa

59

Algunos datos sobre la cPPP

Lanzamiento previsto a mediados de 2016

Ppto estimado: 450-500M€ para 2016-2020

Programas implicados: SECURE SOCIETIES + LEIT-ICT, principalmente, otros podrían unirse (Energía, etc.)

En proceso de constitución de la Asociación Sectorial/industrial en ciberseguridad -> posibilidad de enviar expresiones de interés para ser Miembro (asociación EOS – European Organization forSecurity)

Afectará a las convocatorias de 2017 (enmiendas) y sobretodo al Programa de Trabajo 2018-2020

60

Próximos pasos en la constitución de la cPPP

61

Algunos temas que cubrirá la cPPP(provisional)

Assurance /Security Engineering Data Protection

Privacy preserving technnologies

Identity and Access Management

Trust management Risk management

Governance and cyber security management

network security

system security Cloud security

Trusted hardware /end point security /mobile security

Certification

Achieving User–centricity Auditing and planning

Managed/management security services

Security training services Crypto

62

2017 y más allá…

• WP 2017

– El texto debe ser ratificado en junio de 2016 (posibles enmiendas)

– OJO con los temas ya cubiertos en 2016 (se excluyen de 2017)

• PASAG (Protection and Security Advisory group) -> renovación del 50% de sus miembros

• WP 2018-2020: se empezará a debatir en el 2º semestre de 2016

63

Political drivers relating directly to H2020 objectives:

o Disruptive and Open Innovation

o Migration

o Security: terrorism – radicalisation – cybersecurity

o Physical meets digital - digitalisation of the researching/learning, working and living environment

o Energy challenge and fighting climate change

o Europe's place in the world

Strategic Programming 2018-2020 Contexto Político

64

Contenidos






65

Criterios de Evaluación

Excelencia (Descripción relevante de la llamada o topic)

Impacto

Calidad y eficiencia en la implementación

6666

Excellence

(to the extent that the proposal

addresses the WP topic)

ImpactQuality and efficiency of the

implementation

• Clarity and pertinence of the

objectives;

• Soundness of the concept, and

credibility of the proposed

methodology;

• Extent that the proposed work is

beyond the state of the art, and

demonstrates innovation potential

(e.g. ground-breaking objectives,

novel concepts and approaches,

new products, services or business

and organisational models)

• Appropriate consideration of

interdisciplinary approaches and,

where relevant, use of stakeholder

knowledge.

• The extent to which the outputs of the

project would contribute to each of the

expected impacts mentioned in the work

programme under the relevant topic;

• Any substantial impacts not mentioned in

the work programme, that would enhance

innovation capacity; create new market

opportunities, strengthen competitiveness

and growth of companies, address issues

related to climate change or the

environment, or bring other important

benefits for society;

• Quality of the proposed measures to:

• Exploit and disseminate the projectresults (including management of IPR),and to manage research data whererelevant.

• Communicate the project activities todifferent target audiences

• Quality and effectiveness of the work

plan, including extent to which the

resources assigned to work packages

are in line with their objectives and

deliverables;

• Appropriateness of the management

structures and procedures, including

risk and innovation management;

• Complementarity of the participants

and extent to which the consortium as

whole brings together the necessary

expertise;

• Appropriateness of the allocation of

tasks, ensuring that all participants

have a valid role and adequate

resources in the project to fulfil that

role.

Novedades convocatoria 2016 (RIA/IA)

6767

Excellence

(to the extent that the proposal

addresses the WP topic)

ImpactQuality and efficiency of the

implementation

• Clarity and pertinence of the

objectives;

• Soundness of the concept, and

credibility of the proposed

methodology;

• Quality of the proposed

coordination and/or support

measures.

• The extent to which the outputs of the

project would contribute to each of the

expected impacts mentioned in the work

programme under the relevant topic;

• Quality of the proposed measures to:

• Exploit and disseminate the projectresults (including management of IPR),and to manage research data whererelevant.

• Communicate the project activities todifferent target audiences

• Quality and effectiveness of the work

plan, including extent to which the

resources assigned to work packages

are in line with their objectives and

deliverables;

• Appropriateness of the management

structures and procedures, including

risk and innovation management;

• Complementarity of the participants

and extent to which the consortium as

whole brings together the necessary

expertise;

• Appropriateness of the allocation of

tasks, ensuring that all participants

have a valid role and adequate

resources in the project to fulfil that

role.

Novedades convocatoria 2016 (CSA)

68

Excelencia

Incluye :• Un estado del arte “honesto”• Identificar bien el problema y sus diferentes aspectos• Explicar detalladamente las soluciones propuestas (en todos los casos),

nuevos conceptos, etc…

Demostrar que se conoce bien los proyectos y actividades realizados en esedominio hasta el momento Explicar bien el “step forward the currentsituation”, es decir, dónde está la innovación que presentamos (verdaderainnovación)!

Claridad y concisión No repetir conceptos y apoyarse en figuras yresúmenes de lo más destacado de esa sección. (sin abusar)

Demostraciones, validaciones, etc… Hay que explicar en detalle losescenarios de prueba, los socios implicados, cómo se realizará la recopilaciónde información sobre resultados y cómo realimentará esta información alproyecto.

Credibilidad de la propuesta -> idea factible desde el punto de vista de los“Practitioners”

69

Impacto (I)

Incluye :• Repasar los items del impacto específico que lista el topic• Cuál es la mejora del conocimiento existente hasta el momento• Cómo mejoramos la competitividad de las empresas en EU y fuera de la EU• Impacto social, medioambiental (si es el caso) & long-term sustainability• Dissemination Plan, Exploitation plan (approach to market), IPR, Data manegement plan

Factor humano e impacto social No olvidar explicar aceptación social de lasolución, ergonomía, factor humano en la toma de decisiones…

Plan de diseminación (OBLIGATORIO) Identificar correctamente qué y aquién se quieren comunicar resultados.

Complementariedad con acciones ya financiadas en otros programas

Explicación de la sostenibilidad de la solución más allá de la finalización de lapropuesta (visión a medio-largo plazo).

Plan de explotación (OBLIGATORIO) Es bueno hacer un SWOT análisis,explicar cómo afecta a la actividad de cada socio, explicar cómo el proyectoinfluenciará el sector, intentar cuantificar (no sólo descripción cualitativa)…

70

Impacto (II)

Demostrar el beneficio real: la reducción de riesgos y costes para el usuario final

Ser realistas en cuanto a los medios técnicos y humanos necesarios para llevar a cabo la propuesta

Tratar de integrar información sobre sistemas y procesos ya existentes

71

Implementación (I)

Incluye :• Work plan, distribución de tareas y recursos de todo tipo.• Descripción y explicación del consorcio• Management plan, Risk & contingency plan, Innovation management plan,

Internal communication plan

Coherencia y eficacia en el plan de trabajo a desarrollar (no dejar escapar losdetalles)

Planes de contingencia y mitigación de riesgos concisos pero específicos paracada paso crítico dado en pos de la solución.

Dimensión de colaboración internacional, si se da el caso, debe estar muy bienexplicada (qué partner, porqué él, tareas específicas, explotación posterior, ...).

Integración de usuarios finales como socios de las propuestas (Advisory Boardsson cosa del pasado) y con competencias reales en la materia

Consorcio equilibrado y bien balanceado

72

Planificar bien los deliverables Ni demasiados, ni muy pocos, ni todos

al final del proyecto!

No dejar tareas sin especificar quién las va a hacer, cuándo se va a

iniciar acabar y cuál es el resultado (entregable) de la misma.

Tampoco sobre-saturar de tareas!!!!!

Consorcios: Atención condiciones de eligibilidad!!!! Una propuesta

competitiva tiene bien definida la relación entre los partners y usuarios al

respecto de la explotación, cesión y uso de los resultados, así como

actividades bien detalladas.

Equipos multidisciplinares, con verdaderos especialistas de cata tema,

p.e., de temas éticos, regulación, estandarización, business,…

Atención colaboración internacional muy bien detallada y justificada!

Implementación (II)

73

Lecciones aprendidas… Una buena propuesta explica bien sus objetivos, de forma clara y

concisa en las primeras páginas Las propuestas buenas explicancómo responden, punto por punto, a las demandas del topic, de la cally del contexto general del programa en las políticas EU (compliancematrix).

Atención a la planificación de las fechas de preparación de propuestas(no dejar todo lo importante para Julio-Agosto!!) Una propuestabuena da una imagen unificada y no de un “collage” de contribuciones.

Se debe integrar bien a los usuarios finales desde el principio de lapropuesta, y eso se nota. La identificación de diferentes tipos deusuario final al que se pretende llegar (target public) es clave para queuna propuesta de solución sea creíble. Esto influye en un buen plan decomunicación y de aproximación a cliente/usuario.

Una propuesta buena presenta unas secciones de ethics, dataprotection, security aspects concisas pero bien elaboradas (quién, qué,cómo).

74

• Si quieres saber si una propuesta es convincente de cara a un evaluador;

• DÁSELA A LEER A ALGUIEN Y OBSERVA

EN CONCLUSIÓN

75

Escrutinio de propuestas• En qué consiste? Análisis de los entregables y actividades de la propuesta en cuanto al uso

de background, manejo o generación (foreground) de información/datos sensibles decomprometer aspectos de seguridad nacional.

• Cuál puede ser el resultado? Puede dar lugar a clasificación de entregables, a actividades, oal total de la propuesta. ATENCIÓN: EN H2020 NO se financian “proyectos sensibles”.

Proposal with No Security Concerns (NSC) No classification but Recommendations for the grant agreement preparation "Restricted UE" and recommendations for the grant agreement preparation "Confidential UE" and recommendations for the grant agreement preparation "Secret UE" and recommendations for the grant agreement preparation Not to finance the proposal

• Qué cosas son “sensibles” en una propuesta? Desde el punto de vista temático (subject ofresearch) o tipológico (type of research). ATENCIÓN: NO punto de vista de confidencialidadcomercial o explotación.

Potential sensitive subject of research: explosives & CBRN infrastructure & utilities border security intelligent surveillance terrorism & organised crime digital security space

Potential sensitive type of research: threat assessments vulnerability assessments specifications capability assessments incidents/scenarios based on real-

life security incidents and potential threat scenarios

76

Escrutinio de propuestas

• Cómo proceder 1/2 En la template de la Parte-B de toda propuesta aparece latable 3.1.e: List of deliverables donde se debe indicar, para cada deliverable eltipo de deliverable y el nivel de diseminación.

Key for classification of deliverables indicating the TYPE and the DISSEMINATION LEVEL

TYPE: R: Document, report DEM: Demonstrator, pilot, prototype,

plan design DEC: Website, patent filing, press &

media actions, videos, etc OTHER: Software, technical diagram, etc

DISSEMINATION LEVEL:

PU: Public, fully open, i.e., web CO: Confidential, restricted under

conditions set in the model GA CI: Classified, information as referred in

EC Decission 2001/844/EC

CDTICDTISOSTUniv.FreeSOSTUniv.FreeCDTI

Table 3.1.e List of deliverables

77

Escrutinio de propuestas• Cómo proceder 2/2 Además, en la template de la Parte-B de toda propuesta aparece el capítulo de

aspectos de seguridad. Si “Activities or results raising security issues: YES”, entonces será encesarioadjuntar la SAL junto con la tabla anexa y descripción sobre qué entidad y quién va a gestionar estainformación (6.3.1) así como si habrá un SAB (6.3.2) y, finalmente, si hay otras medidas de seguridad(6.4).

Yes / No

Yes / No

78

Aspectos éticos y protección de datos (1)

• Todas las propuestas de la convocatoria pasarán por el panel ético

Expertos independientes, legislación y principios éticos que deben cumplir,recomendaciones en la implementación.

• Todas las propuestas deben describir las cuestiones éticas planteadas y laforma en que se abordarán de manera que cumpla las regulacionesnacionales, europeas e internacionales.

• Las propuestas son responsables de:

– Identificar posibles temas éticos en las propuestas

– Gestionarlos dentro de la propuesta, detallarlos y desarrollar estas actividadesdurante el proyecto (importancia de planificar estas actividades, presupuestar,posible creación de un ethics advisory board, etc.)

Rellenar las hojas de “Ethics self-assessment” – parte A de la propuesta

79

Aspectos éticos y protección de datos (2)

• Ejemplos de temas con implicaciones éticas quepueden aparecer en propuestas de sociedadesseguras:

– Data privacy (difusión, procesamiento, etc.)

– Data protection (legislación, medidas de seguridad, etc.)

– Mission/Function creep: cuando se amplía el alcance del proyecto aotros ámbitos en los que se puedan dañar valores éticosfundamentales.

– Dual use

– Misuse/Malevolent use Uso malintencionado desistemas/tecnologías, etc.

80

Contenidos






81

Plataformas, asociaciones y grupos de interés en España

http://www.ametic.es/es/Inicio/contenido.aspx

http://www.ametic.es/es/Inicio/contenido.aspx

82

Plataformas, asociaciones y grupos de interés en Europa

(…)IMG-S

http://www.asd-europe.org/home/

http://www.asd-europe.org/home/

https://www.europol.europa.eu/

https://www.europol.europa.eu/

83

El equipo de Secure Societies en EspañaLa Delegación española en el Comité de Gestión Secure Societies

Dirección Programas Internacionales

Maite Boyero [email protected]

DG GUCI - Servicio de Innovación tecnológica

Nathalie Pá[email protected]

Puntos Nacionales de Contacto de la temática

El equipo CDTI en Bruselas


Marina Martí[email protected]



Oficina de Proyectos Europeos

Ainara Ripa [email protected]





84

Enlaces de interés y otra informaciónFuentes de información

Programa de Trabajo 2016-2017


Web EC Secure societiesH2020

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/crisis-and-terrorism/security-research/index_en.htm

Web Horizonte 2020 Español http://eshorizonte2020.es/

IPR & Open Access http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.topic&id=1301

Ethical issues http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/ethics_en.htm

Búsqueda en Socios en H2020 en Sociedades Seguras (red Puntos Contacto, próximamente, SEREN3)

http://www.security-research-map.eu/index.php?file=search.php&type=1

http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/index_en.cfm



http://www.security-research-map.eu/index.php?file=search.php&type=1

85

Más enlaces de interés

• Security Research (DG HOME): http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/crisis-and-terrorism/security-research/index_en.htm

• Security Research (REA): [email protected]

• Infoday nacional Seguridad, 23 de febrero de 2016. Presentaciones disponibles enwww.cdti.es

• Security Research Conference – La Haya, 1 y 2 de Junio de 2016 (www.srie2016.com)

• SMI2Gs (Security Mission Information and Innovation Groups) – Brokerage event finales de enero de 2016: http://www.asd-europe.org/communication/useful-links/smi2g/

• Infoday y Brokerage Event Europeo, 5 y 6 de abril de 2016: https://www.b2match.eu/seren3brussels2016/pages/13547-presentations

• Red de NCPs de Seguridad, SEREN3: www.seren-project.eu

• LISTAS DE DISTRIBUCIÓN CDTI: http://bit.ly/1UBgtbn

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/crisis-and-terrorism/security-research/index_en.htm


http://www.cdti.es/

http://www.srie2016.com/

http://www.asd-europe.org/communication/useful-links/smi2g/

https://www.b2match.eu/seren3brussels2016/pages/13547-presentations

http://www.seren-project.eu/

http://bit.ly/1UBgtbn

86

Muchas gracias por su atención

