articulo tratamiento preventivo en cancer de mama

Upload: elizabeth-eli-l-ch

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Articulo Tratamiento Preventivo en Cancer de Mama

    1/2

    Treating cervical cancer: Breast and Cervical CancerPrevention and Treatment Act patientsLi-Nien Chien, PhD; E. Kathleen Adams, PhD; Lisa C. Flowers, MD

    OBJECTIVE: To investigate cervical cancer treatment of patients en-

    rolled under the Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment

    Act in Georgia.

    STUDY DESIGN: Georgia Comprehensive Cancer Registry and Medic-

    aid enrollment/claims were used to identify enrollees with preinvasive

    disease (n 1149) and invasive cervical cancer (n 444). Logistic

    regressions were used to estimate factors associated with the odds of

    receiving: (1) cancer workup, (2) precancerous procedure, (3) surgery,

    (4) radiation, and (5) chemotherapy.

    RESULTS: Preinvasive disease cases with cervical intraepithelial neo-

    plasia 3, in situ, a comorbidity or without a Commission on Cancer ap-

    proved hospital nearbywere more likelyto receive surgery. Among invasive

    cases, later stage was associated with higher oddsof receiving radiation or

    chemotherapy. Black patients were less likely to have surgery than white

    patients regardless of preinvasive (P .01) or invasivestatus (P .05).

    CONCLUSION: Treatment patterns among Georgia Medicaid cases ap-

    pear appropriate to stage but 18% with invasive cervical cancer re-

    ceived no cancer treatment, although Medicaid enrolled.

    Cite this article as: Chien L-N, Adams EK, Flowers LC. Treating cervical cancer: Breast and Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Act patients. Am J Obstet

    Gynecol 2011;204:533.e1-8.

    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEThe National Breast and Cervical Cancer

    Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP),

    funded by the Centers for Disease Control

    and Prevention, has provided screening

    and diagnostic follow-up for low-income

    uninsured women since 1990. The Breast

    and Cervical Cancer Prevention and

    Treatment Act (BCCPTA) of 2000 gives

    states the option of offering women in

    the NBCCEDP access to treatmentthrough Medicaid. Although BCCPTA

    mandated that women be screened by

    the NBCCEDP, states could extend eli-

    gibility to women screened by non-

    NBCCEDP providers. Women are con-tinuously eligible for BCCPTA as long as

    they are considered to be under cancer

    treatment by their physicians.

    BCCPTA implementation in Georgia

    led to an increase in Medicaid enroll-

    ment of 2-3 more women with these

    cancers in a given month and shortened

    the enrollment process by 7-8 months.

    Hence, breast cancer patients can enroll

    and potentially start treatment while still

    at an early stage of disease. This could, in

    turn, lead to better outcomes and longer

    survival. The simpler recertification pro-

    cess under BCCPTA created both stable

    insurance coverage and connection with

    the participants health care providers,

    resulting in a 50% decline in the rates of

    disenrollment from Medicaid for bothcancers after BCCPTA.

    The goal of BCCPTA is to provide

    Medicaid coverage to assure high-qual-

    ity treatment. It is important to under-

    stand the cancer treatment pattern of pa-

    tients diagnosed with preinvasive disease

    and invasive cervical cancer under

    BCCPTA.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    The major datasets used were the Geor-gia Cancer Comprehensive Registry

    (GCCR), Medicaid enrollment, and

    claims files. County data were from the

    Area Resource File, Commission on

    Cancer, and Consolidated Analysis Cen-

    ter, Incorporated.

    Incident cervical cancer cases in the

    GCCR from July 1, 2001, through Dec.

    31,2004,were linkedto the Medicaid en-

    rollment file using patients encrypted

    Social Security numbers for those iden-

    tified with a primary site of cancer of thecervix (local stage and beyond). GCCR

    did not include preinvasive (CIN 2 and

    3, in situ) cervical cases; therefore, we

    identified those cases as women who

    were ever enrolled under the BCCPTA

    eligibility category but were not invasive

    cervical or breast cancer cases in the

    GCCR.

    RESULTS

    The Figure shows the types of cervicalcancer treatment that patients receivedwithin 2 years of Medicaid enrollment.

    For patients with preinvasive cervical

    disease, 56% had any cancer workup,

    75% had any precancerous procedure,

    and 21% had a simple hysterectomy. For

    patients with invasive cervical cancer,

    85% had any cancer workup, 34% had

    any invasive surgery, 62% had any radi-

    ation, and 54% had any chemotherapy.

    Among preinvasive cervical patients,

    75% had precancerous procedures, 8%had simple hysterectomy, and 13% had

    both treatments. Less than 1% of these

    patients received only radiation and/or

    chemotherapy and 4% received no treat-

    ment for their disease. Forinvasive cases,

    overall, 15% had invasive surgery, 51%

    had radiation and/or chemotherapy,

    17% had both, and 18% received no can-

    cer treatment.

    Among invasive cases, non-Hispanic

    black patients were significantly less likely

    to have invasive surgery after control forthe other covariates (P .05). Later stage

    From the Department of Health Policy and

    Management (Drs Chien and Adams),

    Rollins School of Public Health, and the

    Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics

    (Dr Flowers), Emory University,

    Atlanta, GA.

    Supported by Grant no. RSGT-05-004-01-

    CPHPS from the American Cancer Society.

    0002-9378/free

    2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

    doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.033

    www.AJOG.org Oncology Research

    JUNE 2011 American Journal of Obstetrics &Gynecology 533

  • 7/29/2019 Articulo Tratamiento Preventivo en Cancer de Mama

    2/2

    was associated with higher odds of radia-

    tion or chemotherapy, but not surgery.

    BCCPTA women were no different in

    terms of receiving invasive surgery, radia-

    tion, or chemotherapy than other eligibil-

    ity groups, whereas disabled patients wereless likely to undergo surgery.

    COMMENTBCCPTA is a policy approach for ad-

    dressing the challenges of the uninsured

    facing serious illness by providing cancer

    treatment through a special Medicaid el-

    igibility option. Further analysis indi-

    cated that a leading reason for the lack of

    treatment was disenrollment from

    Medicaid. Of those patients who were

    continuously enrolled in Medicaid

    over our 2-year study period, only 6%

    had no follow-up treatment. We were

    unable to control for nonclinical fac-

    tors affecting treatment, such as pa-

    tient refusal because of individual be-liefs or preferences.

    Lack of insurance coverage is tradi-

    tionally seen as the main reason for pa-

    tients not to receive timely and appro-

    priate treatment. However, this study

    found that obtaining insurance through

    BCCPTA is only part of the solution to

    help previously uninsured low-income

    women diagnosed with those cancers to

    receive treatment. To increase the rate of

    treatment in this vulnerable group, pa-

    tient navigation intervention might be

    helpful as it has been shown to improve

    mammography screening rates for low-

    income minority populations in several

    studies. Devoting financial resources to

    patient navigation for cervical cancer, as

    with breast cancer, may improve patientfollow-up in this vulnerable population.

    CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

    Expanding Medicaid for uninsured

    low-income patients is a viable policy

    for increasing access to care for cervi-

    cal cancer patients.

    The receipt of clinically appropriate

    care while enrolled in Medicaid can

    prevent new cases as well as improve

    the prognosis and health outcomesfor those already diagnosed with cer-

    vical cancer.

    Evidence that preinvasive cervical pa-

    tients living in a county with a Com-

    mission on Cancer approved hospital

    were likely to receive nonsurgical

    treatment and less likely to have a hys-

    terectomy may indicate that the pres-

    ence of specialists and oncologists as-

    sociated with this type of hospital

    provides more alternative treatment

    options. The effect of disenrollment on the re-

    ceipt of any treatment indicates that

    policy makers and providers should

    work to retain women in Medicaid

    until they have completed their treat-

    ment regimens.

    Patients with invasive cervical cancer

    who received no treatment should be

    further investigated to see whether

    patient navigation is a viable tool to

    address this issue. f

    FIGURE

    Cervical treatment of patients with preinvasiveand invasive cervical cancer under Medicaid

    Chien. Cervicalcancer treatmentunder BCCPTA.AmJObstet Gynecol 2011.

    Research Oncology www.AJOG.org

    534 American Journal of Obstetrics &Gynecology JUNE 2011